August 14th, 2024

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X Deliver Excellent Linux Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X processors are praised for their Linux performance in heavy workloads, offering significant efficiency and improvements, priced at $499 and $649 respectively, with some limitations.

Read original articleLink Icon
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X Deliver Excellent Linux Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and Ryzen 9 9950X processors have been reviewed positively for their performance on Linux, particularly for heavy workloads such as content creation, AI, and high-performance computing (HPC). The Ryzen 9 9900X features 12 cores and 24 threads with a base clock of 4.4GHz, while the Ryzen 9 9950X has 16 cores and 32 threads with a base clock of 4.3GHz. Both processors demonstrate significant performance improvements and power efficiency compared to previous models. The review highlights their suitability for developers and creators, especially those utilizing AVX-512 for AI and HPC tasks. However, there are some limitations, such as the lack of support for RAPL power monitoring and LLVM/Clang compiler targeting for these new processors. The Ryzen 9 9900X is priced at $499, and the Ryzen 9 9950X at $649. The testing was conducted on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS with the Linux 6.10 kernel, showcasing the processors' capabilities across various benchmarks.

- The Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X excel in Linux performance for demanding workloads.

- The processors offer significant power efficiency and performance uplift.

- They are particularly beneficial for developers and content creators using AI and HPC applications.

- Pricing is set at $499 for the 9900X and $649 for the 9950X.

- Some limitations exist regarding power monitoring and compiler support for these processors.

Related

AMD Zen 4 vs. Intel Core Ultra 7 "Meteor Lake" in 400 Benchmarks on Linux 6.10

AMD Zen 4 vs. Intel Core Ultra 7 "Meteor Lake" in 400 Benchmarks on Linux 6.10

The article compares AMD Zen 4 laptops with Intel Core Ultra 7 "Meteor Lake" SoC in 400+ Linux 6.10 benchmarks. Testing involved Ryzen 7 7840HS/U vs. Core Ultra 7 155H. Insights on performance, power consumption, and upcoming releases were discussed.

AMD Ryzen 7000/8000 Series vs. 14th Gen Intel Core CPU Performance on Linux

AMD Ryzen 7000/8000 Series vs. 14th Gen Intel Core CPU Performance on Linux

The article compares AMD Ryzen 7000/8000 Series processors with 14th Gen Intel Core CPUs on Linux 6.10 using 400+ benchmarks. Testing on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS with Linux 6.10 kernel includes various models like Ryzen 9 7950X and Core i9 14900K. Systems used DDR5-6000 memory, AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE graphics, and NVMe SSDs. Results show performance differences and include performance-per-dollar metrics.

AMD delays Ryzen 9000 launch to August "out of an abundance of caution"

AMD delays Ryzen 9000 launch to August "out of an abundance of caution"

AMD has delayed the Ryzen 9000-series desktop processors' launch from July to August due to quality issues. The six- and eight-core models will launch on August 8, and the 12- and 16-core models on August 15.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Linux Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Linux Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, part of the Zen 5 generation, shows promising performance and efficiency in benchmarks, with ongoing improvements for Linux support and future applications in thin clients and IoT.

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X Offer Excellent Linux Performance

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X Offer Excellent Linux Performance

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X processors, priced at $279 and $359, respectively, deliver strong Linux performance, compatibility with AM5 motherboards, and outperform Intel's 14th Gen Core CPUs.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @timlatim - 3 months
The 9950X seems more exciting than the last week's 9700X/9600X. It is comfortably ahead of the previous gen (including X3D) in code compilation and video/image processing, which I care about more than performance in games, and it's also in a class of its own in workloads heavy on AVX-512, though they might be a bit niche.

I think the TDP on the 9700X and 9600X may have been set a bit too low (in fact, there are indications it will be raised in a future BIOS update [1]), which led to a relatively cool reception from reviewers focused on raw performance. When looking at performance-per-watt in Phoronix tests, 9700X and 9600X often fare better than the bigger chips with higher TDP, but for desktops I guess efficiency is just not that big of a concern.

[1] https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-set-to-boost-tdp-for-ryzen-5...

By @fl0ki - 3 months
Shout out to Michael Larabel for performing this much testing for every chip and distro, this close to their release, and with this thorough presentation every single time.

I honestly don't know how he does it. It seems like more testing than can fit in real time, even when running tests of different machines in parallel. His tooling and workflow must be dialed in to levels I can't imagine and YouTubers appear to have yet to reach.

Michael, you are a gift to the industry, thank you for doing all of this so well that we can take it for granted, and thank you for continuing to do it even though many do take it for granted.

By @jrepinc - 3 months
Getting better en better. Can't wait to see what X3D editions can do.