August 14th, 2024

Zen5's AVX512 Teardown and More (Without Redacted Content)

AMD's Zen5 architecture enhances AVX512 capabilities with full 512-bit execution paths, but faces memory bandwidth limitations affecting high-performance computing. IPC improvements vary, with some workloads achieving up to 98% gains.

Read original articleLink Icon
Zen5's AVX512 Teardown and More (Without Redacted Content)

Zen5, AMD's latest processor architecture, introduces significant advancements in AVX512 capabilities, marking a notable leap from its predecessor, Zen4. Unlike Zen4, which utilized a "double-pumping" method to handle 512-bit instructions through 256-bit hardware, Zen5 fully integrates 512-bit execution paths, achieving a throughput of 2048 bits per cycle for desktop variants. This positions Zen5 as a leader in SIMD execution, surpassing Intel's offerings. However, the mobile variant, Strix Point, retains a 256-bit throughput, indicating a bifurcation in AMD's architecture. Despite the impressive AVX512 performance, Zen5 faces a critical limitation in memory bandwidth, which remains unchanged from previous generations. This bottleneck significantly impacts performance in high-performance computing (HPC) workloads, where memory access is crucial. The architecture's IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) improvements are inconsistent across different workloads, with some showing gains as high as 98% in AVX512 tasks, while others lag behind. Overall, while Zen5 showcases remarkable advancements in SIMD execution, its memory bandwidth constraints may hinder its performance in memory-intensive applications.

- Zen5 features full 512-bit execution paths, doubling AVX512 hardware from Zen4.

- The mobile variant, Strix Point, maintains a 256-bit throughput, limiting its performance.

- Memory bandwidth remains a bottleneck, affecting high-performance computing tasks.

- IPC improvements vary widely across workloads, with some achieving up to 98% gains.

- Zen5's advancements position AMD ahead of Intel in SIMD execution capabilities.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @abhinavk - 2 months
Earlier discussion from 7 days ago which included findings from 9600X and 9700X only:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41182395

By @jftuga - 2 months
This is a great, extremely detailed write up!