Cox asks Supreme Court to review holding company liable for pirating subscribers
Cox Communications has petitioned the Supreme Court to review a ruling holding ISPs liable for subscriber piracy, raising critical questions about service provider liability and potential impacts on internet access.
Read original article
Cox Communications has petitioned the Supreme Court to review a Fourth Circuit ruling that found the company liable for the actions of its subscribers who engaged in piracy. The case stems from a 2019 verdict where Cox was ordered to pay $1 billion in damages for failing to disconnect repeat infringers. The Fourth Circuit confirmed Cox's contributory liability but reversed a vicarious copyright infringement finding, leading to a new trial for damages. Cox argues that the ruling threatens internet access for all Americans, particularly in rural areas where alternatives are limited. The company contends that terminating service for repeat infringers could unjustly impact entire households and businesses, including universities and military housing. Cox's petition raises two key questions regarding the extent of service provider liability and whether mere knowledge of infringement constitutes willfulness. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how ISPs handle piracy allegations and their responsibilities towards subscribers.
- Cox Communications is seeking Supreme Court review of a ruling that holds ISPs liable for subscriber piracy.
- The Fourth Circuit's decision could lead to widespread internet terminations, affecting many households and businesses.
- The case raises critical questions about the liability of service providers in relation to copyright infringement.
- A ruling in favor of Cox could clarify the responsibilities of ISPs regarding repeat infringers.
- The outcome may influence how internet providers manage piracy allegations in the future.
Related
Supreme Court Blow: ISP Bill Payers Aren't Piracy Police or Instantly Liable
The Supreme Court denied Voltage Holdings' appeal in a piracy case involving 'Revolt' movie. Courts stressed the necessity of direct evidence for file-sharing authorization, setting a precedent for copyright cases in Canada.
Music labels sue Verizon for more than $2.6B
Major music labels sue Verizon for $2.6 billion, alleging the company profited from customers' copyright violations. Lawsuit claims Verizon ignored infringement notices and fostered piracy, seeking penalties and legal fees.
Record labels sue Verizon for not disconnecting pirates' Internet service
Major record labels sue Verizon for $2.6 billion, accusing the ISP of profiting from copyright infringement by not disconnecting music pirates. Verizon faces criticism for hindering infringement reports. Verizon has not responded.
Federal Appeals Court Rules Fair Use May Be Narrowed to Serve Hollywood Profits
The D.C. Circuit Court upheld Section 1201 of the DMCA, limiting fair use and raising concerns about corporate favoritism and government overreach, while the EFF plans to advocate for individual rights.
ISPs worry that killing FCC net neutrality rules will come back to haunt them
ISPs are challenging a New York law mandating low-cost broadband, fearing it may lead to more state regulations if FCC rules are overturned, impacting investment and consumer choice in broadband services.
1 commentsRelated
Supreme Court Blow: ISP Bill Payers Aren't Piracy Police or Instantly Liable
The Supreme Court denied Voltage Holdings' appeal in a piracy case involving 'Revolt' movie. Courts stressed the necessity of direct evidence for file-sharing authorization, setting a precedent for copyright cases in Canada.
Music labels sue Verizon for more than $2.6B
Major music labels sue Verizon for $2.6 billion, alleging the company profited from customers' copyright violations. Lawsuit claims Verizon ignored infringement notices and fostered piracy, seeking penalties and legal fees.
Record labels sue Verizon for not disconnecting pirates' Internet service
Major record labels sue Verizon for $2.6 billion, accusing the ISP of profiting from copyright infringement by not disconnecting music pirates. Verizon faces criticism for hindering infringement reports. Verizon has not responded.
Federal Appeals Court Rules Fair Use May Be Narrowed to Serve Hollywood Profits
The D.C. Circuit Court upheld Section 1201 of the DMCA, limiting fair use and raising concerns about corporate favoritism and government overreach, while the EFF plans to advocate for individual rights.
ISPs worry that killing FCC net neutrality rules will come back to haunt them
ISPs are challenging a New York law mandating low-cost broadband, fearing it may lead to more state regulations if FCC rules are overturned, impacting investment and consumer choice in broadband services.