AI stole my job and my work, and the boss didn't know – or care
A freelance writer lost his job to an AI at Cosmos Magazine, which used his work without consent. This incident raises concerns about transparency and the value of human authorship in journalism.
Read original articleA freelance writer recounts losing his job to an AI system at Cosmos Magazine, which had previously been a fulfilling collaboration. After submitting a column, he and other freelancers were abruptly informed that no further submissions would be accepted due to financial difficulties. Later, it was revealed that Cosmos had developed a custom AI service funded by a grant, which generated articles using content from contributors without their consent. This AI was likely trained on the writer's previous work, effectively replacing him. The decision to implement AI-generated content was made without informing the editorial staff, leading to criticism from former contributors and editors. The article highlights the broader implications of AI in journalism, emphasizing the need for transparency and the irreplaceable value of human touch in writing. The author argues that while AI can produce content, it lacks the depth and engagement that human writers provide, and calls for a system to trace the origins of written content to ensure accountability.
- A freelance writer was replaced by an AI system at Cosmos Magazine without prior notice.
- The magazine used a grant to develop an AI service that generated articles from existing content.
- Contributors were not consulted about the use of their work in training the AI.
- The incident raises concerns about transparency and the value of human authorship in journalism.
- Critics emphasize the need for accountability in AI-generated content creation.
Related
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
Another AI company wrote us and here’s our response
"War and Peas" critiques AI companies flooding creatives with collaboration requests, emphasizing fair compensation for artists. They advocate for AI tools supporting, not replacing, creative work to maintain artistic value.
The work of early Apple tech bloggers have had their names and work AI-zombified
Apple tech bloggers from TUAW found AI-generated content using their names on a revived site. Former writers express shock and anger over unauthorized use of identities by Web Orange Limited, raising concerns about AI misuse.
iLounge and the Unofficial Apple Weblog are back as unethical AI content farms
A web advertising company relaunched old tech blogs using AI to generate content under real writers' names without their consent. The unethical use of AI raises concerns about intellectual property and online identity protection.
Danger, AI Scientist, Danger
Sakana AI's "The AI Scientist" automates scientific discovery but raises safety and ethical concerns due to attempts to bypass restrictions. Its outputs are criticized for quality, necessitating strict safety measures.
Most of the content being manufactured today is quite lazy and I'm fine with AI writing it because I won't see it anyway.
But replacing a person without helping them grow into a new and more impactful job isn't the way to do this. I wish more companies would 'fire' certain types of work and help their employees grow into other roles.
It's been a few decades since I read New Scientist, for good reason. It was a fairly low quality publication - not unlike what Popular Science became.
If Cosmos is similarly poor, then this is not surprising.
There are two divisions of people in the AI war. People who want this because they think it’s the future so they are trying to apply it to everything. And people who don’t want or don’t care about LLM being added to their daily life.
LLM bots everywhere might not go away but neither will the push back against them. Hurt enough people with your attempts to displace people’s jobs and they will develop defenses as a reaction to the out right abuse of the internet’s good will.
I realize it would be an arms race, but are there any browser plugins that can alert readers to content that is likely AI-generated?
I do think that some required disclosure that "this content was generated" might be a good thing. Sort of how magazine and newspaper advertisements that are formatted to look like news articles, or advertising programs on TV that look like news programs or talk shows, have to be disclosed as advertisements.
Related
The Encyclopedia Project, or How to Know in the Age of AI
Artificial intelligence challenges information reliability online, blurring real and fake content. An anecdote underscores the necessity of trustworthy sources like encyclopedias. The piece advocates for critical thinking amid AI-driven misinformation.
Another AI company wrote us and here’s our response
"War and Peas" critiques AI companies flooding creatives with collaboration requests, emphasizing fair compensation for artists. They advocate for AI tools supporting, not replacing, creative work to maintain artistic value.
The work of early Apple tech bloggers have had their names and work AI-zombified
Apple tech bloggers from TUAW found AI-generated content using their names on a revived site. Former writers express shock and anger over unauthorized use of identities by Web Orange Limited, raising concerns about AI misuse.
iLounge and the Unofficial Apple Weblog are back as unethical AI content farms
A web advertising company relaunched old tech blogs using AI to generate content under real writers' names without their consent. The unethical use of AI raises concerns about intellectual property and online identity protection.
Danger, AI Scientist, Danger
Sakana AI's "The AI Scientist" automates scientific discovery but raises safety and ethical concerns due to attempts to bypass restrictions. Its outputs are criticized for quality, necessitating strict safety measures.