Stop Using Git Ignore
Eddie Jaoude advocates for using a global Git ignore file alongside project-specific ones to reduce clutter, streamline personal exclusions, and improve management practices among developers.
Read original articleEddie Jaoude emphasizes the importance of using a global Git ignore file in addition to the project-specific .gitignore file. While the project .gitignore helps manage files that should not be tracked in a repository, it often becomes cluttered with entries for various IDEs and tools that differ among developers. This can lead to confusion and an ever-growing list of exclusions that may not be relevant to all contributors. Jaoude suggests that a global Git ignore file can streamline this process by allowing developers to set personal exclusions that apply across all their repositories. This approach minimizes the risk of accidentally committing unwanted files, such as system-generated files like .DS_Store on macOS. To set up a global Git ignore, users can create a .gitignore file in their home directory and configure Git to recognize it. Jaoude argues that maintainers should avoid overloading the project .gitignore with excessive entries and instead focus on educating the community about proper usage. This strategy not only simplifies the management of ignored files but also promotes better practices among developers.
- A global Git ignore file can prevent unnecessary clutter in project-specific .gitignore files.
- Developers can customize their global ignore settings to suit their individual workflows.
- Overloading the project .gitignore can lead to confusion and maintenance challenges.
- Educating the community on proper Git ignore usage benefits all contributors.
- Setting up a global Git ignore is a straightforward process that enhances productivity.
Related
I kind of like rebasing
People debate Git workflows, favoring rebasing for a linear history. Redowan Delowar prefers rebasing to consolidate changes and maintain a clean commit history. They discuss interactive rebasing benefits, squashing commits, handling conflicts, and offer practical tips.
My .gitconfig File Dissected
The article delves into .gitconfig file breakdown, covering user details, GPG key signing, Git aliases, and workflow optimization tips. Encourages readers to customize their .gitconfig for enhanced Git usage.
Show HN: A simple app to create .gitignore files
GitHub repository offers a .gitignore Builder UI tool for creating .gitignore files. A demo link is provided. To use locally, download the repository, run 'npm install' and 'npm run dev' in the terminal. Access via localhost.
The title "Stop Using Git Ignore", which the author of the blog post chose for this submission, doesn't represent his actual article well, though it probably gets more upvotes on Hacker News. I wish he'd presented the article more accurately, as it's a worthwhile observation that, for example, we probably have so many .DS_Store files and .vscode/.idea directories that defining them once will save us some hassle.
There don't seem to be any downsides to a long .gitignore. Who cares if it is 100 or 1000 lines?
Kind of pointless, in my view. I think a user-global .gitignore is fine to have to make sure you don't make mistakes for net-new projects or projects where someone forgot to add your exclusions, but otherwise, you're going to need both if you choose to use a user-global.
Use the repo’s ignore, not your own.
> Everyone uses different operating systems, IDEs and dev tools.
How is this related to .gitignore?
> This list will only keep growing, it will never end
Where's the problem? A random Facebook's repo has its gitignore file weigh 2KB[0]. Is this a problem?
> Is the “.gitignore” file competing with the “README.md” for the most updated file in the git repo? I hope not
Again, why is this a bad thing?
The author just wanted to rant about something but didn't know about what
*[0] https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/blob/main/.giti...
Easy enough to catch but you'll miss some. Literally no cost to adding it to repo config either
The first place to catch errant build files and artifacts from entering the repo database is the .gitignore file. The second place to catch them is the PR. The .gitignore prevents repetitive file adds from entering the PR.
What I don’t want to see in an enterprise environment is someone checking in a 100MB binary file that gets checked into dev because the team was busy and approved a PR hastily. What would be helpful is a git hook that checks the mime type of a file and decide if it should even by a type of file that should be checked into a project.
Strong disagree. Please do continue trying to educate the community, but that's no reason to take the guardrails off.
Many projects may want to commit IDE files. Ignoring them globally is simply wrong.
Almost mandatory for monorepos too!
.git/info/exclude
Not me, never heard of it.
I use ./.git/info/exclude to bypass commits and pushes, that is good enough for me.
Quickly reading the title, I though it was about stop using git period, go to something else :)
Some focus on battles they are likely to win, others on battles they are bound to lose.
Related
I kind of like rebasing
People debate Git workflows, favoring rebasing for a linear history. Redowan Delowar prefers rebasing to consolidate changes and maintain a clean commit history. They discuss interactive rebasing benefits, squashing commits, handling conflicts, and offer practical tips.
My .gitconfig File Dissected
The article delves into .gitconfig file breakdown, covering user details, GPG key signing, Git aliases, and workflow optimization tips. Encourages readers to customize their .gitconfig for enhanced Git usage.
Show HN: A simple app to create .gitignore files
GitHub repository offers a .gitignore Builder UI tool for creating .gitignore files. A demo link is provided. To use locally, download the repository, run 'npm install' and 'npm run dev' in the terminal. Access via localhost.