August 18th, 2024

Why isn't Colorado's snowpack ending up in the Colorado River?

Recent University of Washington research reveals that lack of spring rainfall significantly reduces Colorado's snowpack streamflow, with warmer springs causing plants to consume more snowmelt, impacting water management strategies.

Read original articleLink Icon
Why isn't Colorado's snowpack ending up in the Colorado River?

Recent research from the University of Washington has identified a significant factor contributing to the discrepancy between predicted and actual streamflow from Colorado's snowpack: a lack of spring rainfall. Since 2000, water managers have struggled to accurately forecast water availability from the snowpack, with actual streamflow consistently falling short of predictions. The study indicates that warmer and drier springs account for nearly 70% of this issue. With reduced rainfall, plants increasingly rely on snowmelt for water, which diminishes the amount flowing into streams. The researchers found that only about 10% of the missing water was lost through sublimation, suggesting that the main issue lies in plant consumption of snowmelt due to the absence of spring precipitation. The study analyzed 26 headwater basins and revealed that lower elevation basins experienced more pronounced streamflow deficits, as snow there melts earlier, allowing plants more time to absorb the water. The findings emphasize the need for improved predictions of spring rainfall to enhance water management strategies, especially as the ongoing Millennium drought continues to impact water resources in the region.

- Lack of spring rainfall is a major factor in reduced streamflow from Colorado's snowpack.

- Warmer, drier springs account for nearly 70% of the discrepancy between predicted and actual water availability.

- Plants increasingly consume snowmelt due to reduced rainfall, leading to lower streamflow.

- Lower elevation basins show more significant deficits in streamflow due to earlier snowmelt.

- Improved predictions of spring rainfall are essential for effective water management in the region.

Link Icon 9 comments
By @fiftyfifty - 8 months
One of these years the Colorado mountains are going to get a fraction of the snow they normally get and it's going to be a disaster for the entire southwest US. It almost happened in the winter of 2020-21, the snowpack statewide was just 30-40% of average at the end of winter. A heavy, wet, late spring storm dropped a ton of snow in the Colorado mountains in April of 2021 and saved the day, but man if that storm hadn't happened...imagine the 60 odd million people from Colorado to Mexico fighting over just a third of the normal amount of water they have to work with?
By @tallowen - 8 months
As someone who has lived in the southwest, it can't be understated how important the issue of water is.

One thing to keep in mind is that most estimates place human consumption of water at below 20% - a ton of the water of the basin goes to agriculture. To be clear, I think this makes sense - with added water regions in the basin can be some of the most productive ag regions in the country.

The big problem is policy has not adapted to scarcity. There are real tradeoffs when we have 30% less water than forecast and it's not clear who should suffer them.

I think there is often a misconception that this area is somehow "too hot" to live in. Since the advent of air conditioning, we have moved past this. Generally speaking similarly sized homes in Boston will consume more energy for HVAC than Phoenix will simply because heating homes in cold winters is often more energy intensive than cooling in the summer.

Water usage in the colorado basin: https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/article/meat-of-the-matter-col...

By @animal_spirits - 8 months
Anytime water and the southwest comes up I always recommend the documentary series Cadillac Desert, based on the book. It's on YouTube and tells the story of how the southwest became livable due to the damming of many major rivers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PR2BSGQt2DU

By @cdaringe - 8 months
I used to live in Albuquerque, which sources water from a few places—a small mountain range to the east, aquifer, and the rio grande (aka the rio not-at-all-grande).

> Settlements in the region depend on groundwater. In the 1960s the City of Albuquerque began to extract large quantities of potable groundwater from wells drilled in the southeast and northeast heights. It was thought that this water came from a huge aquifer that would take centuries to exhaust. In the late 1980s there were declines in the water levels near Coronado Center causing concern that the water resource was not properly understood

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albuquerque_Basin

Whoopsie!

The RG AFAIK is also supplied by primary Colorado mountain sources, but also from various other smaller mountain and rainfall feeds. I get that the Colorado River is the big kahuna. Id would love to see the RG at least casually discussed in these bigger sw water discussions.

By @kamikazeturtles - 8 months
I'm surprised they had less rain. Here in Minnesota, it's been constant heavy rain. My pond floods almost every week. I have to pump it out into a nearby lake and that's a pain.
By @tadeegan - 8 months
> With less rain, the plants in the area rely more on the snowmelt for water, leaving less water to make its way into the nearby streams. Decreased rain also means sunny skies, which encourages plant growth and water evaporation from the soil.

Logical next step: remove the vegetation for more human population!

By @igtztorrero - 8 months
Answer: The very bad math drying up the Colorado River

https://youtu.be/AzpYHXgfbbI?si=Snwfv4ocXn018CF_

By @smeej - 8 months
Am I the only one surprised this took as much detailed study as it did? Nobody noticed a lot more greenery about in the basins they're talking about? Or nobody noticed the fact that it hadn't been raining in those places in the spring and wondered why the plants there were still fine?

These don't seem like observations that require laboratories and massive studies to me.

By @bacon_waffle - 8 months
Because it's in the Arkansas River drainage?