US hospital told family their daughter had checked out when in fact she'd died
Jessie Marie Peterson died in April 2023 at a California hospital, but her family was misinformed and searched for her for a year. They filed a lawsuit seeking over $5 million.
Read original articleJessie Marie Peterson, a 31-year-old woman, died in April 2023 while under the care of Mercy San Juan Medical Center in Sacramento, California. Her family was misinformed by the hospital that she had checked herself out against medical advice, leading them to search for her for over a year. The hospital failed to notify her family of her death and instead stored her body in an off-site facility, where it decomposed for nearly a year. The family only learned of her fate in April 2024, when a detective informed them that Peterson had died of cardiopulmonary arrest. The family has filed a civil lawsuit against the hospital, accusing it of negligence, mishandling of a corpse, and emotional distress. They are seeking over $5 million in damages, claiming the hospital's actions were "malicious and outrageous." Dignity Health, which operates the hospital, expressed condolences but stated they could not comment on the ongoing litigation. The family's inability to obtain an autopsy or hold a proper funeral due to the condition of Peterson's remains has compounded their distress.
- Jessie Peterson died in a California hospital, but her family was misinformed about her status.
- The hospital stored her body without notifying her family, leading to a year-long search.
- The family has filed a lawsuit against the hospital for negligence and emotional distress.
- They are seeking over $5 million in damages due to the hospital's actions.
- Dignity Health has expressed sympathy but cannot comment on the lawsuit.
Related
After 190 bodies found rotting, funeral home owners ordered to pay $950M
A Colorado judge ordered Jon and Carie Hallford to pay over $950 million for improperly storing 190 bodies and defrauding families, facing numerous criminal charges and potential prison time.
Disney claims streaming arbitration clause binding in resort wrongful death suit
Disney is attempting to dismiss a wrongful death lawsuit from Jeffrey Piccolo, claiming negligence after his wife died from an allergic reaction at a restaurant, citing arbitration terms from Disney+.
Disney wants a wrongful death lawsuit thrown out because plaintiff had Disney+
Disney faces a wrongful death lawsuit from Jeffrey Piccolo after his wife died from an allergic reaction at a restaurant. Disney seeks arbitration, claiming Piccolo agreed to it via Disney+ in 2019.
Disney wants wrongful death suit thrown out because widower had Disney+
Disney is challenging a wrongful death lawsuit related to Kanokporn Tangsuan's allergic reaction at a restaurant, seeking arbitration based on prior customer agreements, while the plaintiff seeks over $50,000 in damages.
Disney drops bid to stop allergy death lawsuit over Disney+ terms
Disney has withdrawn its request to move a wrongful death lawsuit to arbitration, allowing the case, involving an allergic reaction at a Disney World restaurant, to proceed in court.
- Many commenters express outrage over the hospital's failure to notify the family of her death, suggesting negligence and possible malpractice.
- There are speculations about the hospital's internal processes and the potential for systemic issues in hospital management and software.
- Some commenters question whether the situation could lead to criminal charges rather than just a civil lawsuit.
- Several individuals share personal stories that highlight similar failures in hospital care and communication.
- Concerns are raised about the implications of HIPAA regulations on family notifications in such cases.
I had a cousin who voluntarily checked himself into the hospital related to severe withdrawal symptoms (and had bouts of psychosis related to said with withdrawal - meth addictions are nasty). His mother stayed for awhile but had to leave for work. She was repeatedly guaranteed by multiple doctors and nurses that he could not check himself out and would be there for several days at least. They told her to come back the next morning.
Late that night, he was discharged. Not even "he checked himself out". The hospital discharged him (and that's over an hour ride away from home, btw - no hospitals in rural areas these days).
He had no phone and no wallet. According to staff, he tried to call his mother to pick him up, but couldn't remember her cell phone number (it had changed recently). He called his sister and left a message, but she was traveling and didn't get it until much later. According to the hospital, he tried to call several different numbers trying to get a ride home and they made him stop and made him leave. In a quite rough downtown area he was not familiar with. While clearly not in his right mind. At 2am. With no wallet, no phone, no nothing.
The hospital had his mother's contact info. They did not give it to him even when he requested it. They did not attempt to contact her in any way.
We still don't know what happened afterwards. His body was found four days later in the river and it had been there for awhile.
Forcibly discharging someone under those circumstances and refusing to even contact their emergency contacts is beyond belief. I'm furious about it. Apparently it's common and not even something there's any recourse for.
This crosses into criminal liability.
A couple of years ago I climbed Mt Whitney in California. One of the climbers that day was from the east coast and failed to show up for work a few days later. The family became concerned and called the car rental agency in Las Vegas where he flew to and rented his car. The agency said the car had been returned. After another day of him missing they called the car rental agency again to confirm and once again the agency said the car was in the lot. The next day the rangers found the car was still parked in the Mt Whitney parking lot and search and rescue was finally dispatched.
In this case I believe it didn't make a difference because the climber appeared to die from acute injury on the mountain the day of his climb but in another scenario maybe those 2 days would've been the difference between being rescued or dying from exposure.
The article is so much worse and the headline buries the lede. I would be horrified. My condolences to the family.
Two days before “checking out”, the daughter called the mom to say she was better and was about to leave. Soon after that, something bad happens (possibly malpractice) and she dies. An autopsy would reveal the true cause of death, so the hospital quietly ships her to an off-site morgue, doesn’t even fill a death certificate, and fabricates her checking out.
Now the body is beyond decomposed and an autopsy is impossible. The hospital claims it was a simple mix-up and gets away with a bit of bad press and a negligence charge.
It appears they need a name change after this lawsuit
Despite the misconduct, I think saving people's lives is the most fundamental duty of a hospital.
To put it another way, clearly the outcome in this story was unacceptable, but what was the correct outcome?
While your web dev has a very good idea about infrastructure and code maintenance these guys are usually clueless about CI, git, secrets management etc. but still they now all want to migrate their stuff to azure, because it’s cool… to say the truth I didn’t understand the reason why they want to. People that are basically relying on Microsoft wizard based development.
Shocking was that this was not only some bureaucracy software, but systems that are used for actual operations and patient management.
I guess that many people died already because windows developers but nobody did a systematic investigation so we don’t know.
Shouldn't this be a criminal case?
What on earth is that? Hypo/hyperglycaemia? You'd have to have extremely poorly managed type 1 diabetes for that to become fatal without a massive screwup at that age.
Related
After 190 bodies found rotting, funeral home owners ordered to pay $950M
A Colorado judge ordered Jon and Carie Hallford to pay over $950 million for improperly storing 190 bodies and defrauding families, facing numerous criminal charges and potential prison time.
Disney claims streaming arbitration clause binding in resort wrongful death suit
Disney is attempting to dismiss a wrongful death lawsuit from Jeffrey Piccolo, claiming negligence after his wife died from an allergic reaction at a restaurant, citing arbitration terms from Disney+.
Disney wants a wrongful death lawsuit thrown out because plaintiff had Disney+
Disney faces a wrongful death lawsuit from Jeffrey Piccolo after his wife died from an allergic reaction at a restaurant. Disney seeks arbitration, claiming Piccolo agreed to it via Disney+ in 2019.
Disney wants wrongful death suit thrown out because widower had Disney+
Disney is challenging a wrongful death lawsuit related to Kanokporn Tangsuan's allergic reaction at a restaurant, seeking arbitration based on prior customer agreements, while the plaintiff seeks over $50,000 in damages.
Disney drops bid to stop allergy death lawsuit over Disney+ terms
Disney has withdrawn its request to move a wrongful death lawsuit to arbitration, allowing the case, involving an allergic reaction at a Disney World restaurant, to proceed in court.