August 22nd, 2024

Webtoon Targets 170 Pirate Domains Through DMCA Subpoena

Webtoon Entertainment has filed a DMCA subpoena against over 170 pirate domains to identify their operators, aiming to combat piracy despite recent disappointing financial results and stock price drops.

Read original articleLink Icon
Webtoon Targets 170 Pirate Domains Through DMCA Subpoena

Webtoon Entertainment has filed a DMCA subpoena targeting over 170 pirate domains in an effort to identify the operators behind these sites and combat piracy, which it views as a significant challenge. The company, which recently went public on the Nasdaq, has faced disappointing financial results, with flat revenues leading to a significant drop in stock price. Despite this, Webtoon maintains a positive outlook, attributing its struggles to currency fluctuations rather than piracy. The subpoena, filed in a Texas federal court, compels Cloudflare to disclose the identities of individuals associated with the infringing domains, which include popular sites like Bato.to and Mangareader.to. Webtoon has previously seen success with similar legal actions, resulting in the shutdown of numerous pirate sites. The company emphasizes its commitment to protecting its intellectual property through various anti-piracy measures, including the development of proprietary technology to detect unauthorized use of its content. The outcome of this latest legal effort remains to be seen, but Webtoon is likely to continue its anti-piracy initiatives moving forward.

- Webtoon has filed a DMCA subpoena against over 170 pirate domains to identify their operators.

- The company recently went public but has faced disappointing financial results, leading to a significant drop in stock price.

- Webtoon attributes its struggles to currency fluctuations rather than piracy.

- Previous legal actions have successfully led to the shutdown of several pirate sites.

- The company is committed to protecting its intellectual property through various anti-piracy measures.

Related

South Korean ISP Infected 600,000 Torrenting Subscribers with Malware

South Korean ISP Infected 600,000 Torrenting Subscribers with Malware

South Korea's KT accused of distributing malware to 600,000 subscribers to block torrent traffic, sparking privacy concerns and legal scrutiny. Police investigate organized hacking attempt by KT. Concerns raised over network interference.

South Korean ISP 'Infected' Torrenting Subscribers with Malware

South Korean ISP 'Infected' Torrenting Subscribers with Malware

South Korea's KT accused of distributing malware to block torrent traffic, affecting Webhard services. Allegations suggest organized hacking for eavesdropping and cost management. Legal scrutiny ensues, revealing network management challenges.

22 people exposed abroad for operating Japanese anime piracy sites

22 people exposed abroad for operating Japanese anime piracy sites

22 individuals involved in foreign-based piracy of Japanese anime and manga were exposed recently. Chinese authorities acted against 18, Brazil closed 36 piracy sites. CODA notes rising overseas piracy trends, estimating losses of 1.9-2.2 trillion yen. Plans for international cooperation to address the issue.

Z-Library: More Domains Seized Than Any Other Pirate Site in History

Z-Library: More Domains Seized Than Any Other Pirate Site in History

Law enforcement seized over 350 Z-Library domains, making it the most targeted pirate site. Despite seizures, Z-Library and The Pirate Bay adapt by creating new domains. Legal actions and domain losses haven't stopped Z-Library's operations, challenging anti-piracy efforts.

Link-Busters Sent a Billion DMCA Takedown Requests to Google Search

Link-Busters Sent a Billion DMCA Takedown Requests to Google Search

Link-Busters sends over a billion DMCA takedown requests to Google Search to combat shadow libraries. Penguin Random House leads the effort, with 75% success rate in removing infringing URLs.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @metadat - 8 months
Looks like it's all Manga / Anime piracy this time around.

Usually I'm very against such diligent copyright enforcement, but in this case the infringement seems egregious and committed on a for-profit basis. Am I missing something?