August 23rd, 2024

Ex-bank CEO gets 24 years after falling for crypto scam, causing bank collapse

Shan Hanes, a former bank CEO, was sentenced to over 24 years for embezzling $47 million linked to a cryptocurrency scam, causing Heartland Tri-State Bank's collapse and significant investor losses.

Read original articleLink Icon
Ex-bank CEO gets 24 years after falling for crypto scam, causing bank collapse

A former bank CEO, Shan Hanes, was sentenced to over 24 years in prison for embezzling $47 million after falling victim to a cryptocurrency scam. Hanes, 53, directed bank employees to transfer funds to a fraudulent crypto wallet as part of a "pig butchering" scheme, despite warnings from others about the scam. Initially targeted in late 2022, he lost his own money and resorted to stealing from a local church, an investor club, and his daughter's college fund before misappropriating bank funds. His actions led to the collapse of Heartland Tri-State Bank in Kansas, resulting in significant losses for the bank and its customers. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) absorbed the losses, which included $9 million for bank investors. Hanes pleaded guilty to embezzlement, and while he faced a maximum of 30 years, the judge imposed a sentence longer than prosecutors had requested. Victims of the scam are still uncertain about recovering their losses, with some losing up to 80% of their retirement savings. The case highlights the growing prevalence of cryptocurrency scams and the need for vigilance against such fraudulent schemes.

- Shan Hanes was sentenced to over 24 years for embezzling $47 million due to a crypto scam.

- His actions caused the collapse of Heartland Tri-State Bank, leading to significant losses for investors and customers.

- Hanes ignored multiple warnings about the scam and continued to direct bank funds to scammers.

- The FDIC absorbed the losses, but victims may never fully recover their funds.

- The case underscores the increasing risk of cryptocurrency scams and the importance of awareness.

Link Icon 16 comments
By @TheDong - 8 months
The problem isn't so much "falling for the scam", as "stealing from the bank".

Even if, for example, you find a loophole that allows you to make 100% guaranteed money, the deposits of the bank belong to the bank, they are not the personal funds of the CEO.

Like, putting money in treasuries is basically 100% safe. It's fine for the bank to put the money in treasuries and profit. It's highly illegal for the bank CEO to take 20 million from the bank, use it as personal funds, buy personal treasuries, and then put the money back.

The title makes it sound like the problem was that he was an idiot and fell for a scam. The true problem was that he misappropriated bank funds in the process of doing so... and if there's any one person you should expect to understand that line, it would be the CEO of a company (or I guess CFO if you have to pick one, but if you pick two it's CFO and CEO)

By @roenxi - 8 months
"Falling for a crypto scam" doesn't really do it justice. He appears to have been under a spell of insanity and committing various crimes. Although how the bank was in a situation where one man could pilfer funds like that seems like a questionable aspect, surely there were other bank employees who should have been aware of and preventing the madness. It is hard to see this happening and everyone around him agreeing that the CEO was competent for the role.
By @captn3m0 - 8 months
> Because the bank was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the FDIC "absorbed the $47.1 million loss"

> Right now, it's unclear how or when victims will be repaid for losses. Broomes ordered "that restitution be finalized at a separate hearing within the next 90 days," the US Attorney's Office said. Many victims will never fully recoup losses to their life savings and retirement funds

Can someone explain how are these two statements compatible?

By @devjab - 8 months
Isn’t the headline a little click-baity? He got 24 years because of embezzlement. Sure it was because he fell for a crypto scam, but he stole the money…

Maybe it’s just me, but I was thinking he did it by accident.

By @throwadobe - 8 months
> After he asked for a $12 million loan from a neighbor, Brian Mitchell, his neighbor detected the scam and refused to lend the money.

Who asks their neighbors for $12 million? The dude was out of his mind. 24 years seems long but at the same time somewhat deserved given his role and the amount of damage his sheer stupidity inflicted.

By @big-green-man - 8 months
He didn't get 24 hears for falling for a crypto scam. He got 24 years for embezzling money. It was just his stupidity that got himself cammed out of the embezzled money. He'd be in prison even if he had made a hefty profit with the proceeds.
By @nunez - 8 months
> Because the bank was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the FDIC "absorbed the $47.1 million loss" after "Hanes’ fraudulent actions caused HTSB to fail and the bank investors to lose $9 million," the US Attorney's Office said. On top of those losses, Hanes' fraudulent actions caused "catastrophic losses to bank customers who relied on the bank for the safekeeping of their savings," the press release confirmed.

Thank goodness for the FDIC here. A win for "big government."

By @lupusreal - 8 months
If anybody thinks this is too harsh a punishment for being a retard who fell for an obvious scam, note that he wasn't merely a retard but a thief as well. If he had only given the scammer his own money he wouldn't be faced with this prison time, but the absolute idiot went and stole other people's money and gave it to the scammer.
By @jonasdegendt - 8 months
The article claims the bank's losses were insured by the federal government, yet it closes by saying some people that banked there are having financial trouble.

How's this work? Aren't the bank's losses essentially people's deposits? Where'd the insurance money go then, or has it simply not yet been paid out?

By @grouchomarx - 8 months
>Three days later he directed two wire transfers totaling $6.7 million to be sent by the bank to the crypto wallet, and a whopping $10 million less than two weeks later, and another $3.3 million days afterward.

that's gold medal scamming right there. Almost unbelievable

By @ChrisArchitect - 8 months
By @s_dev - 8 months
You would think a Bank CEO would have more financial acumen than falling for this nonsense. 24 years seems appropriate.
By @jongjong - 8 months
In his defense, given that the entire banking industry has become a scam, it can be difficult to see where the line is.