August 23rd, 2024

Two states become first in US to ban use of PFAS in firefighters protective gear

Massachusetts and Connecticut have banned PFAS in firefighters' protective gear, requiring PFAS-free equipment by 2027 and 2028, respectively, amid health concerns and opposition from the chemical industry.

Read original articleLink Icon
Two states become first in US to ban use of PFAS in firefighters protective gear

Massachusetts and Connecticut have become the first states in the U.S. to ban the use of PFAS, known as "forever chemicals," in firefighters' protective gear. This legislation mandates that all turnout gear, including jackets, pants, and gloves, must be free of PFAS by 2027 in Massachusetts and by 2028 in Connecticut. PFAS are linked to serious health issues, including cancer, and have been implicated in a significant percentage of firefighter deaths due to cancer from 2002 to 2019. The ban faced opposition from the turnout gear industry and chemical manufacturers, who argue that PFAS are essential for the performance of protective equipment. However, advocates, including Diane Cotter, whose husband developed prostate cancer linked to PFAS exposure, have pushed for this change, highlighting the health risks associated with these chemicals. The legislation also requires manufacturers to inform buyers if their products contain PFAS. While the American Chemistry Council has expressed concerns about the potential impact on gear performance, some fire departments have already transitioned to PFAS-free options, challenging the industry's claims about the necessity of these chemicals.

- Massachusetts and Connecticut are the first states to ban PFAS in firefighters' gear.

- The ban aims to reduce health risks associated with PFAS, which are linked to cancer and other serious conditions.

- The legislation requires PFAS-free gear by 2027 in Massachusetts and 2028 in Connecticut.

- The ban faced significant opposition from the chemical industry and turnout gear manufacturers.

- Some fire departments have already adopted PFAS-free gear, countering industry claims about performance.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @jerlam - 8 months
I thought the main source of PFAS from firefighting was from the actual chemicals used to suppress the fires, but that might be specifically a US military thing:

Firefighting Foam: DOD is Working to Address Challenges to Transitioning to PFAS-Free Alternatives: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-107322