The Vital Necessity of Old Books (2023)

In his response to Richard Hanania's critique of old books, Joel J. Miller argues for the importance of reading ancient texts. He reflects on the cultural obsession with individualism in the 1970s, highlighting how this self-centered mindset has persisted. Miller acknowledges Hanania's point that many contemporary books may lack substance, but he defends the value of older works, asserting that they provide cognitive and perspectival diversity. He emphasizes that ancient authors, despite their errors, offer insights that challenge modern biases and assumptions. Miller suggests that reading old books is not merely about content but also about engaging with different methods of thinking. This engagement fosters innovation and critical thought, which are essential in a world increasingly dominated by homogenized ideas. He concludes that old books are vital for understanding history and expanding contemporary thought, as they present unique perspectives that can enrich modern discourse.

- Old books provide cognitive diversity and challenge modern biases.

- Engaging with ancient texts fosters critical thinking and innovation.

- The obsession with individualism has historical roots that persist today.

- Reading old works is about the process of thinking, not just content.

- Ancient authors offer insights that can enrich contemporary discussions.