Recursive Macros with C++20 __VA_OPT__
C++20's __VA_OPT__ feature enhances variable-argument macros, enabling recursive macros like MAKE_ENUM for better handling of arguments, improving macro expansion mechanics, and addressing previous limitations for cleaner code.
Read original articleC++20 introduces the __VA_OPT__ preprocessor feature, which enhances the functionality of variable-argument macros. This feature allows for the creation of recursive macros, enabling developers to define macros that can handle an arbitrary number of arguments more effectively. A practical application of this is the MAKE_ENUM macro, which generates an enum type and a corresponding function to convert enum values to strings. The macro utilizes __VA_OPT__ to manage cases where no arguments are provided, thus preventing syntax errors. The blog post details how to implement a FOR_EACH macro that applies another macro to each of its arguments, demonstrating the power of recursive macros in C++. The author explains the mechanics of macro expansion, including how the C preprocessor handles object-like and function-like macros, and the significance of the replacing and unavailable bits during expansion. The article also discusses the limitations of traditional macro approaches and how C++20's enhancements provide a more elegant solution. Overall, the introduction of __VA_OPT__ and recursive macros in C++20 represents a significant advancement in macro capabilities, allowing for cleaner and more maintainable code.
- C++20 introduces __VA_OPT__ for improved variable-argument macros.
- Recursive macros enable the creation of more complex and flexible macros.
- The MAKE_ENUM macro demonstrates practical use of __VA_OPT__.
- The blog explains the mechanics of macro expansion and its implications.
- C++20 enhancements address limitations of previous macro implementations.
Related
Tail Recursion for Macros in C
The blog discusses tail recursion for macros in C, introducing __VA_TAIL__() to enable real recursion, overcoming inefficiencies of traditional recursive macro calls. It showcases how tail recursion improves processing efficiency in macros.
Maximal Min() and Max()
Recent changes to the min() and max() macros in the Linux kernel have increased compilation times, prompting discussions on reverting to simpler macros to improve efficiency and reduce code expansion.
Enum class improvements for C++17, C++20 and C++23
Enhancements to C++ enum classes in versions 17, 20, and 23 improve code safety and usability, introducing features like brace initialization, "using enum," and std::to_underlying for better readability and maintainability.
Quote-unquote "macros"
The blog post examines macros in the Janet programming language, highlighting their advantages over traditional memoization, particularly in compile-time storage allocation and the significance of quoting and unquoting in macro development.
PEP 638 – Syntactic Macros
PEP 638 proposes syntactic macros for Python, enhancing expressiveness while maintaining simplicity. It focuses on hygiene in variable naming and allows user-defined extensions for modular programming in data science and machine learning.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwYILWyTRMQ&list=TLPQMTIwODI...
timestamp - 40:47
Related
Tail Recursion for Macros in C
The blog discusses tail recursion for macros in C, introducing __VA_TAIL__() to enable real recursion, overcoming inefficiencies of traditional recursive macro calls. It showcases how tail recursion improves processing efficiency in macros.
Maximal Min() and Max()
Recent changes to the min() and max() macros in the Linux kernel have increased compilation times, prompting discussions on reverting to simpler macros to improve efficiency and reduce code expansion.
Enum class improvements for C++17, C++20 and C++23
Enhancements to C++ enum classes in versions 17, 20, and 23 improve code safety and usability, introducing features like brace initialization, "using enum," and std::to_underlying for better readability and maintainability.
Quote-unquote "macros"
The blog post examines macros in the Janet programming language, highlighting their advantages over traditional memoization, particularly in compile-time storage allocation and the significance of quoting and unquoting in macro development.
PEP 638 – Syntactic Macros
PEP 638 proposes syntactic macros for Python, enhancing expressiveness while maintaining simplicity. It focuses on hygiene in variable naming and allows user-defined extensions for modular programming in data science and machine learning.