August 29th, 2024

Computer Scientists Prove That Heat Destroys Entanglement

Computer scientists discovered that quantum entanglement vanishes completely above a specific temperature in spin systems, suggesting classical algorithms may suffice for high-temperature quantum problems while remaining optimistic about future advancements.

Read original articleLink Icon
Computer Scientists Prove That Heat Destroys Entanglement

A team of computer scientists has made a significant discovery regarding quantum entanglement while developing a new algorithm. They proved that entanglement, a phenomenon where quantum particles become interconnected, vanishes completely above a certain temperature in spin systems, which are mathematical models representing arrays of interacting atoms. This finding, termed the "sudden death" of entanglement, was previously only observed indirectly. The researchers, who were not initially focused on entanglement, stumbled upon this proof while exploring the capabilities of quantum computers. Their work indicates that at high temperatures, entanglement does not merely weaken but disappears entirely, a result that does not depend on the number of atoms involved but rather on their interactions. This discovery has implications for understanding quantum systems and the potential limitations of quantum algorithms, as it suggests that for certain high-temperature scenarios, classical algorithms may suffice. Despite the negative result regarding entanglement, the researchers remain optimistic about future discoveries in quantum computing and the development of new algorithms.

- Computer scientists proved that entanglement vanishes completely above a specific temperature in spin systems.

- The discovery was made while developing a new quantum algorithm, highlighting the intersection of computer science and quantum physics.

- The phenomenon, known as "sudden death" of entanglement, indicates that entanglement does not just weaken but disappears entirely at high temperatures.

- The results suggest that classical algorithms may be sufficient for certain high-temperature quantum problems.

- Researchers remain hopeful for future advancements in quantum computing despite the negative findings regarding entanglement.

Related

DARPA's military-grade 'quantum laser' will use entangled photons to outshine

DARPA's military-grade 'quantum laser' will use entangled photons to outshine

Researchers are developing a military-grade "quantum laser" funded by DARPA, using entangled photons for a powerful beam penetrating adverse weather. This innovation enhances precision, strength, and performance in challenging environments.

A Quantum Leap in Factoring

A Quantum Leap in Factoring

Recent quantum computing advancements include Peter Shor's Shor algorithm for factoring large numbers and Oded Regev's new scheme reducing gate requirements. Practical implications and implementation challenges persist despite optimism for future cryptography improvements.

Exploring Quantum Mpemba Effects

Exploring Quantum Mpemba Effects

Researchers investigate quantum versions of the Mpemba effect, where warm water freezes faster than cold water. Three studies explore interparticle correlations, quantum fluctuations, and initial conditions, advancing quantum thermodynamics and technology.

Mathematicians Prove Hawking Wrong About the Most Extreme Black Holes

Mathematicians Prove Hawking Wrong About the Most Extreme Black Holes

Mathematicians Kehle and Unger proved that extremal black holes can exist, challenging previous beliefs and invalidating the third law of black hole thermodynamics, while further research is needed on their formation.

High-Temperature Gibbs States Are Unentangled and Efficiently Preparable

High-Temperature Gibbs States Are Unentangled and Efficiently Preparable

The paper reveals that Gibbs states of local Hamiltonians become separable above a certain temperature, allowing efficient sampling and challenging existing beliefs about quantum correlations, with no super-polynomial speedups in preparation.

Link Icon 13 comments
By @rocqua - 8 months
I have heard, and like, the theory that 'waveform collapse' due to 'observation' is due to entaglement. Specifically, the idea is that most of the world is quantum entangled, 'observation' then has the effect of entangling the observed particle with 'most of the world'. The 'waveform collapse' is then the result of this entaglement with everything causing the waveform to concentrate heavily.

Is this concept debunked by this paper, or could it be that 'destroys entanglement' actually means 'becomes entangled with almost everything else'?

By @danbruc - 8 months
A similar result for superposition would be huge, I guess, after a century we could finally understand what qualifies as a measurement device, why we do not observe quantum effects at macroscopic scales, what actually saves or kills Schrödinger's cat.
By @misja111 - 8 months
Isn't heat transmitted by photons? In that case, isn't it inevitable that heat destroys entanglement? Because the transmission of heat means some photon has to interact with one of the entangled particles.
By @gradschoolfail - 8 months
For practitioners, a rough description of their argument is on pg 7 (note: separable=unentangled, β =1/kb T) of https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.16850

This state [rho] is the Gibbs state at infinite temperature, and is in the interior of the convex hull of product states. So, as β tends to zero, ρ will eventually enter the interior of this convex hull, making it separable. This happens at a finite β which depends on system size.

By @wizardforhire - 8 months
For those interested in some quantum stuff and interested in watching a kindred spirit do approachable practical experiments I highly advise watching this guys stuff [1]. Consider it a psa

[1] https://youtube.com/@HuygensOptics

By @cma - 8 months
Something related from the og computer scientist, though does their new result have impacts on the quantum zeno effect?

    [I]t is easy to show using standard theory that if a system starts in an eigenstate of some observable, and measurements are made of that observable N times a second, then, even if the state is not a stationary one, the probability that the system will be in the same state after, say, one second, tends to one as N tends to infinity; that is, that continual observations will prevent motion. Alan and I tackled one or two theoretical physicists with this, and they rather pooh-poohed it by saying that continual observation is not possible. But there is nothing in the standard books (e.g., Dirac's) to this effect, so that at least the paradox shows up an inadequacy of Quantum Theory as usually presented.
    — Quoted by Andrew Hodges in Mathematical Logic, R. O. Gandy and C. E. M. Yates, eds. (Elsevier, 2001), p. 267.
> As a result of Turing's suggestion, the quantum Zeno effect is also sometimes known as the Turing paradox.
By @swayvil - 8 months
I skimmed 5 pages down looking for the darn temperature of disentanglement with no luck. Could one of you more perseverant readers enlighten me?
By @GlibMonkeyDeath - 8 months
Please note that the entanglement here are on spin states in equilibrium with a mean temperature bath - this doesn't apply to e.g. a pair of (or sets of) entangled photons (which aren't interacting with anything on the way to the detectors.)
By @adolph - 8 months
<ctl>+f entropy didn't return anything, so I went looking for the paper. It looks like it is: "High-Temperature Gibbs States are Unentangled and Efficiently Preparable" [0] but maybe it is "Structure learning of Hamiltonians from real-time evolution" [1]

0. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16850

1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00082

By @thelittlenag - 8 months
What is the implication for high temperature superconductors? Does this mean that they can't exist?
By @Gooblebrai - 8 months
How do they come up with those amazing illustrations?

Quanta Magazine always impresses me with the illustrations for each article

By @GolDDranks - 8 months
By @6d6b73 - 8 months
Some day, when I have moree time, I will work on proving my theory that the entanglement doesn't really exist, and the whole quantum weirdness is just bs. But know I have to finish coding that data acquisition system. Priorities..