August 29th, 2024

High-Performance Binary Search

Optimized binary search algorithms can be up to four times faster than std::lower_bound by eliminating branching and improving memory layout, enhancing cache performance and data locality for specific contexts.

Read original articleLink Icon
High-Performance Binary Search

The article discusses optimizations for the binary search algorithm, highlighting two variants that can be significantly faster than the standard implementation found in libraries like std::lower_bound. The first variant eliminates branching, which is a common bottleneck in performance due to control hazards and data hazards. By using predication, the algorithm can avoid conditional jumps, leading to improved performance, especially on smaller arrays. The second variant focuses on optimizing memory layout to enhance cache performance, utilizing a specific arrangement known as the Eytzinger layout, which groups frequently accessed elements together. This layout improves data locality, reducing cache misses and improving overall search speed. The article emphasizes that while these optimizations can yield substantial performance gains, they may not be universally applicable and should be tested in specific contexts. The performance improvements are quantified, showing that the optimized versions can be up to four times faster than the standard implementation, depending on the size of the data set.

- Optimized binary search can be up to 4x faster than std::lower_bound.

- Branchless implementation reduces control hazards and improves performance.

- Memory layout optimization enhances cache performance through better data locality.

- Eytzinger layout groups frequently accessed elements to minimize cache misses.

- Performance gains vary based on array size and specific use cases.

Related

Binary Search Tree with SIMD

Binary Search Tree with SIMD

Clément Jean presents a cache-friendly algorithm for binary search trees in Go, optimizing memory access with SIMD operations. The approach enhances search efficiency, demonstrated through benchmark tests, and suggests broader applications in data structures.

C++ Design Patterns for Low-Latency Applications

C++ Design Patterns for Low-Latency Applications

The article delves into C++ design patterns for low-latency applications, emphasizing optimizations for high-frequency trading. Techniques include cache prewarming, constexpr usage, loop unrolling, and hotpath/coldpath separation. It also covers comparisons, datatypes, lock-free programming, and memory access optimizations. Importance of code optimization is underscored.

`noexcept` affects libstdc++'s `unordered_set`

`noexcept` affects libstdc++'s `unordered_set`

The article examines the impact of the `noexcept` specifier on `std::unordered_set` performance in libstdc++, highlighting optimization opportunities and advocating for improvements to handle hash function efficiency better.

Do low-level optimizations matter? Faster quicksort with cmov (2020)

Do low-level optimizations matter? Faster quicksort with cmov (2020)

The article emphasizes the importance of low-level optimizations in sorting algorithms, highlighting how modern CPU features and minimizing conditional branches can enhance performance, particularly with the new `swap_if` primitive.

The Treacherous Optimization (2006)

The Treacherous Optimization (2006)

The author attempts to optimize Hex Fiend's string searching to surpass grep's performance but initially fails. They adopt grep's optimization technique, achieving slight improvements while questioning the trade-offs involved.

Link Icon 0 comments