August 29th, 2024

String Theorists Accidentally Find a New Formula for Pi

Physicists Arnab Priya Saha and Aninda Sinha discovered a new formula for calculating pi while researching string theory, enabling faster calculations and relating to the Riemann zeta function.

Read original articleLink Icon
String Theorists Accidentally Find a New Formula for Pi

Two physicists, Arnab Priya Saha and Aninda Sinha from the Indian Institute of Science, have inadvertently discovered a new formula for calculating pi while researching a unifying theory of fundamental forces in string theory. Their work, published in Physical Review Letters, reveals an infinite number of equations for pi, stemming from their exploration of how strings interact. Historically, pi has been calculated using various methods, including geometric approaches by ancient scholars like Archimedes and infinite series developed in the 15th century. Saha and Sinha's formula is a generalization of earlier methods, including one by the Indian mathematician Madhava, which requires many terms to achieve high precision. Their new formula allows for faster calculations of pi, needing fewer terms for smaller values of a parameter they introduced. Although their primary goal was not to find a formula for pi, the discovery highlights the interconnectedness of mathematical concepts, as their equations also relate to the Riemann zeta function, a significant unsolved problem in mathematics. This unexpected finding underscores the potential for interdisciplinary research to yield surprising results.

- Physicists discovered a new formula for pi while studying string theory.

- The formula allows for infinitely many equations for calculating pi.

- Their work generalizes earlier methods, enabling faster calculations.

- The discovery also relates to the Riemann zeta function, a major mathematical mystery.

- The researchers did not initially aim to find a formula for pi; it was a by-product of their main research.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @latexr - 5 months
> What is striking is that it depends on the factor λ, a freely selectable parameter. No matter what value λ has, the formula will always result in pi. And because there are infinitely many numbers that can correspond to λ, Saha and Sinha have found an infinite number of pi formulas.

I don’t really get the logic here. If you can pick any number for the parameter and get the same result, why does it matter? Why is it even there? They even simplify it the formula without the parameter right after. What’s stopping anyone from writing:

  2 = 2 + λ - λ
And saying “there are infinitely many numbers that can correspond to λ, so I have found an infinite number of formulas to calculate the number 2”?
By @sedtacet - 5 months
Numberphile down-to-earth interview Arnab Priya Saha and Aninda Sinha: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lvTjEZ-bbw