August 30th, 2024

Bay Watch: Northern California is an energy catastrophe waiting to happen

Chevron is relocating its headquarters from California to Texas due to regulatory conflicts, raising concerns about the future of its refineries and gasoline supply in Northern California.

Read original articleLink Icon
Bay Watch: Northern California is an energy catastrophe waiting to happen

California's energy landscape has drastically changed since the early 20th century, transitioning from a global energy powerhouse to a state heavily reliant on external sources for energy. The historical context begins with the discovery of oil in Pico Canyon in 1876, leading to the establishment of significant oil companies, including Chevron, which has been a major player in the state for over 140 years. However, increasing regulatory pressures, high taxes, and legal challenges have strained the relationship between Chevron and California's government. Recently, Chevron announced its decision to relocate its headquarters from San Ramon, California, to Houston, Texas, citing fundamental disagreements with state energy policies. This move raises concerns about the future of Chevron's operations in California, particularly its two major refineries, which are crucial for supplying gasoline to Northern California's 15 million residents. Additionally, the city of Richmond is proposing a tax on Chevron's refinery operations, which could generate significant revenue but also exacerbate tensions. The concentration of gasoline production in just three refineries in Northern California poses a risk of economic disruption if any of these facilities face operational challenges.

- Chevron is relocating its headquarters from California to Texas due to regulatory conflicts.

- California's energy sector has shifted from self-sufficiency to reliance on external sources.

- The city of Richmond is proposing a tax on Chevron's refinery operations to address local pollution.

- Only three refineries supply most of Northern California's gasoline, raising concerns about potential economic crises.

- Chevron's departure may impact its remaining operational assets in California.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @nullc - 8 months
Paid article that cuts out before it even states its thesis. I don't understand the value of putting posts like this on HN. Presumably the paying subs have seen it, for everyone else it says close to nothing and access to the rest appears to cost $300.
By @alephnerd - 8 months
Bad article.

The only reason Chevron's in San Ramon is because the older generation of execs and mid-managers used to attend the UC Davis B-School (both undergrad and grad), and helped setup the campus in San Ramon (right by the Costco).

Wirth doesn't have the same attachment to San Ramon, so it makes sense for Chevron to move to the actual Energy Market hub (Houston).

San Ramon also stopped giving sweetheart deals to Chevron now that it's economic base is much more diverse from 20-30 years ago, because the city has become a Palo Alto 2.0 and can sustain itself of property taxes, and Chevron began the move to Houston back in 2018.

And finally, Chevron is a massive player in the renewables space - with Chevron Ventures taking plenty of strategic bets in the battery tech, solar, and charging industries.

By @dave333 - 8 months
If there's a gas shortage we just go back to work from home as in Covid. That's what the long term plan should be anyway.
By @happosai - 8 months
Article talking about fossil fuels without mentioning climate change, huge red flag.

I'm sure the paid part would turn out to be some kind of partisan hot take excuse on why we shouldn't do things to slow down climate change. At least not in this particular case. Or not as drastically as others suggest. Or not until China. Etc...