August 30th, 2024

X can proceed to trial in case against Media Matters after Texas judge ruling

A Texas federal judge denied Media Matters' dismissal request in Elon Musk's X lawsuit, which claims a report linking hateful content to major advertisers caused financial harm. The trial starts April 7.

Read original articleLink Icon
X can proceed to trial in case against Media Matters after Texas judge ruling

A federal judge in Texas has denied Media Matters' request to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Elon Musk's X, formerly known as Twitter. The lawsuit, initiated in November, stems from a Media Matters report that highlighted the presence of hateful content on the platform alongside advertisements from major companies like Apple, IBM, and Disney. Following the report, these companies paused their advertising campaigns on X. X's attorneys argue that the report was "intentionally deceptive" and caused financial harm to the company. U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor ruled that X has adequately presented its claims, allowing the case to proceed to trial on April 7. Media Matters President Angelo Carusone described the lawsuit as a "frivolous" attempt to silence critics. In a related matter, O'Connor previously dismissed Media Matters' request to include Tesla as an interested party in the lawsuit, citing a lack of evidence for Tesla's financial interest in the case. O'Connor is also overseeing a separate antitrust lawsuit involving X and a global advertising association but has recused himself from that case due to a potential conflict of interest.

- A Texas judge has ruled against Media Matters' dismissal request in a lawsuit by Elon Musk's X.

- The lawsuit follows a report by Media Matters linking hateful content on X to major advertisers.

- The trial is set to begin on April 7.

- X claims the report was misleading and caused financial damage.

- Media Matters' president criticized the lawsuit as an attempt to intimidate critics.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @kstrauser - 5 months
This is ludicrous. Media Matters provided evidence to back their claims. There's no legitimate question of whether they lied about them or knowingly published incorrect statements. Their assertion, demonstrated, is that Twitter ran ads for major companies next to horrifically racist content. This isn't really disputed past Musk basically saying "uh-uh did not!"

This lawsuit is purely about shutting down criticism.

By @NPC82 - 5 months
Venue shopping should be illegal. Musk, and many other SLAAP plantiffs, routinely choose this judge because they know it's one of the few districts these cases won't be dismissed outright because of judge O’Connor.
By @jauntywundrkind - 5 months
Letting the case go forward in Texas because a couple ads happened to be shown in Texas is the height of absurdity & everyone involved is fleecing the justice system with a sham like that.
By @eadler - 5 months
The Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68023366/x-corp-v-media...

The actual ruling: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.38...

It is consistently infuriating that reports on law don't actually link to the documents they report on.