August 30th, 2024

Musk's X suspended in Brazil after disinformation row

X has been suspended in Brazil for non-compliance with court orders regarding disinformation. Musk criticized the ruling, while Apple and Google must remove the platform from their app stores.

Read original articleLink Icon
Musk's X suspended in Brazil after disinformation row

X, formerly known as Twitter, has been suspended in Brazil after failing to appoint a new legal representative as mandated by a Supreme Court judge. The suspension, ordered by Justice Alexandre de Moraes, is a result of X's non-compliance with court orders related to the blocking of accounts accused of spreading disinformation. The judge's order requires X to pay fines and comply with Brazilian law before the suspension can be lifted. Musk criticized the ruling, claiming it undermines free speech and is politically motivated. The Brazilian telecommunications agency is tasked with enforcing the ban, which is expected to take effect within 24 hours. Additionally, companies like Apple and Google have been given a five-day deadline to remove X from their app stores. Users attempting to access the platform via VPNs could face fines. The situation escalated as Musk's satellite internet company, Starlink, also faced financial repercussions in Brazil, with its bank accounts frozen due to a related court order. Justice Moraes has previously restricted social media platforms in Brazil and is investigating former President Jair Bolsonaro and his supporters for their involvement in an alleged coup attempt. This incident highlights ongoing tensions between social media companies and Brazilian authorities regarding compliance with local laws.

- X has been suspended in Brazil for failing to comply with court orders.

- Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the suspension due to disinformation concerns.

- Musk criticized the ruling as a threat to free speech.

- Companies like Apple and Google must remove X from their app stores.

- Starlink's bank accounts were frozen in Brazil following a related court order.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @alephnerd - 5 months
Notably, India has the exact same law (the Brazilian one is probably based on it), and X complies with the Indian government.

Musk is also trying to get Starlink approved in India [0], and is on extremely thin ice after ghosting Modi (and Modi's alliance partner Chandrababu Naidu who's state was going to get the Tesla gigafactory) for Xi [1].

Now India's 2nd largest oligarch (Sunil Mittal) has majority ownership in Starlink's largest competitor in the Western world - Eutelsat OneWeb [2]. They also have majority stake in British Telecom now too [3].

Ford has also been given the red carpet for an EV-first play in India [4], along with Hyundai Kia's EV expansion in CBN's state.

Edit: cannot reply to below

In India, the Judiciary has primacy over legislative.

If the judiciary rules one way or the other, legislative need to either reach a supermajority, live with it, or litigate and re-litigate in the Supreme Court.

Which is why I point out that when FIRs under IT Rules are received, X complies.

Brazil has the same separation of powers, yet X clearly fights against the top of the Judiciary in Brazil, while complying with the lowest of the Judiciary (and even before it reaches court) in India.

[0] - https://www.businesstoday.in/tech-today/news/story/elon-musk...

[1] - https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-shocked-musks-surp...

[2] - https://www.eutelsat.com/en/group/company-structure.html

[3] - https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/indias-bharti-enterpri...

[4] - https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/ford-likely-t...