August 31st, 2024

Freetube is the best way to watch YouTube

Freetube enhances YouTube viewing by allowing customization, disabling features, and improving privacy by storing data locally. It is available for desktop but lacks a mobile version. Users can import subscriptions.

Read original articleLink Icon
Freetube is the best way to watch YouTube

Freetube is an application designed to enhance the YouTube viewing experience by allowing users to customize their interface and control what content they see. Unlike the standard YouTube website, which is structured to keep viewers engaged for extended periods, Freetube enables users to disable features such as comments, recommended videos, and autoplay. It also offers privacy benefits by storing watch history locally on the user's computer rather than on YouTube's servers. Freetube utilizes Invidious, an open-source frontend for YouTube, which prevents Google from tracking user activity. The application is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux, but lacks a mobile version. Users can import their YouTube subscriptions and watch history into Freetube, allowing for a seamless transition from the traditional platform. The settings menu provides options to further customize the viewing experience, including the ability to hide distractions and automatically skip certain video segments. Overall, Freetube aims to provide a more user-controlled and less intrusive way to enjoy YouTube content.

- Freetube allows users to customize their YouTube experience by disabling unwanted features.

- The application enhances privacy by storing watch history locally and preventing Google tracking.

- It is available for desktop operating systems but does not have a mobile version.

- Users can import their YouTube subscriptions and watch history for a smoother transition.

- Freetube utilizes Invidious to access YouTube content without the usual distractions.

Link Icon 14 comments
By @roenxi - about 2 months
I'm torn. I'm not a huge fan of Google and I don't have a lot of respect for the YouTube selection algorithm. However this culture of expecting Google to host the data then freeloading off it by blocking the tracking and ads is also a bit ugly.

There is an unwritten social contract here. Google is willing to host and organise a vast number of videos because that'll attract an audience for ads. If there are too may freeloaders resisting the ads then Google won't host the videos, and on the path to that the freeloaders are really just leeching off a system in an entitled way (unless their goal is to destroy YouTube in which case good on them for consistency and for picking a worthy target).

If people aren't going to be polite and accept that contract then fine, enforcement was always by an honour system. But strategically if Google's social contract doesn't work for someone then they shouldn't use YouTube - they'd just be feeding the beast. They should go make PeerTube work or investigate the long list of alternative video platforms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_online_video_platforms .

By @eurekin - about 2 months
In the age of LLM's, I with there was some way to automatically pull videos about particular topic, extract the information out of the transcript (skip the clickbait as well) and deduplicate. I spend so much time watching videos just to conclude "ah right, it's actually based on the same info previous 3 videos"
By @dreadlordbone - about 2 months
I assume this is in the wake of the cease & desist sent to Invidious (the engine behind Freetube) by the YouTube peeps: https://torrentfreak.com/youtube-orders-invidious-privacy-so...
By @ruthmarx - about 2 months
It definitely is. I switched to it primarily because the main website just takes up so much memory, needlessly.

I have no moral issue with this either. If Google wants money then they need to be more legitimate in their business dealings. No ignoring DMCA abuse, no ending user accounts with no appeal, no dark patterns period.

By @thisislife2 - about 2 months
Is this an Electron app? I wonder why it can't be just a browser extension instead?
By @WarOnPrivacy - about 2 months
If it can hide videos with overexpressive faces on the title cards, I'm in.
By @jeffbee - about 2 months
Let's try it. 20 seconds to first start on a M2 mac mini, not amazing. Search takes about 3-5 seconds. Navigate to video another 3-5 seconds. No 4k. No casting. Can't change the playback speed. Can't jump on timeline with 0-9 keys. Doesn't sync to my other devices. Doesn't know about my membership perks, of course.

After a few minutes I would say this is easily the worst way to watch YouTube short of printing the videos out.

By @MBCook - about 2 months
Or if you don’t want to see ads you could pay for it instead. Like an adult. Works great.

They present a perfectly valid choice to you, and it works great. It’s a reasonable enough price (not great but reasonable), but it supports the creators you watch with part of your subscription money.

Plus it has other benefits if you care, like free TV shows and movies and YouTube music. I don’t use that stuff but it is there.

By @hnburnsy - about 1 month
On SmartTvs and AndroidTv use STN...

https://smarttubenext.com/

By @codedokode - about 2 months
Is there a server-side Youtube client? I.e. the one that you install on a server and open in a browser.
By @2-3-7-43-1807 - about 2 months
By @bitwize - about 2 months
The best way to watch YouTube is via the official YouTube site or app, because everything else is a potential DMCA violation and, if it blocks or skips ads, is tantamount to theft of service.
By @cozzyd - about 2 months
Doubtful it beats YouTube premium on my TV...
By @dreamymoon - about 2 months
yup been using for 3/4 months now. tho it is filled with bugs. if you use extended screens, good luck. and a few more like app crashing, unable to handle multiple app launches at once, and so on.

I am looking for a better open-source alternative tbh.