The await event horizon in JavaScript
The "await event horizon" in JavaScript prevents returning control once an async function awaits a Promise, potentially causing resource leaks. Generator functions offer a better solution for structured concurrency.
Read original article
The concept of the "await event horizon" in JavaScript is likened to the event horizon of a black hole, where once execution crosses this boundary, it cannot return until a Promise settles. This phenomenon occurs in async functions when they pause for a Promise's result, leading to potential resource leaks if the Promise never resolves. For instance, if an async function acquires a lock and then awaits a Promise that does not settle, the lock remains unreleased, causing a leak. While explicit resource management and AbortSignal can mitigate some issues, they do not fundamentally change the limitations imposed by the await event horizon. The article discusses how structured concurrency, which allows for better control over function lifetimes, is hindered by the nature of async functions. It suggests that while structured concurrency is theoretically possible, it is not achievable with current async/await constructs. Instead, generator functions, which are not bound by the await event horizon, offer a more robust solution for implementing structured concurrency in JavaScript. These functions allow for explicit control over execution flow, enabling developers to manage resources more effectively.
- The "await event horizon" in JavaScript prevents returning control once an async function awaits a Promise.
- Resource leaks can occur if a Promise does not settle, leaving locks or resources unreleased.
- Current solutions like explicit resource management and AbortSignal do not fully resolve the issue.
- Structured concurrency is limited by async functions, but generator functions provide a viable alternative.
- Future improvements to async functions may be needed to achieve true structured concurrency.
Related
JavaScript Visualized – Event Loop, Web APIs, (Micro)Task Queue [video]
The event loop in JavaScript is crucial for managing asynchronous tasks efficiently. It includes the call stack, web APIs, task queue, and microtask queue, enabling non-blocking operations. For more details, feel free to inquire.
JavaScript Promises from the Ground Up
This tutorial explores JavaScript Promises, emphasizing their role in managing asynchronous code. It covers Promise basics, states, handling methods, event loop, practical usage with fetch(), and the shift towards Promise-based operations for enhanced code quality.
I avoid async/await in JavaScript
Cory argues that async/await complicates JavaScript code, obscures optimization opportunities, increases cognitive load in error handling, and suggests promises are cleaner and more manageable for asynchronous operations.
Async hazard: MMAP is blocking IO
Memory-mapped I/O can cause blocking I/O in asynchronous programming, leading to performance issues. Conventional I/O methods outperform it unless data is cached in memory, highlighting risks in concurrent applications.
Async2 – The .NET Runtime Async experiment concludes
The .NET team's async2 experiment aims to enhance async/await efficiency by shifting management to the runtime, improving performance and exception handling, but may take years to become production-ready.
2 commentsRelated
JavaScript Visualized – Event Loop, Web APIs, (Micro)Task Queue [video]
The event loop in JavaScript is crucial for managing asynchronous tasks efficiently. It includes the call stack, web APIs, task queue, and microtask queue, enabling non-blocking operations. For more details, feel free to inquire.
JavaScript Promises from the Ground Up
This tutorial explores JavaScript Promises, emphasizing their role in managing asynchronous code. It covers Promise basics, states, handling methods, event loop, practical usage with fetch(), and the shift towards Promise-based operations for enhanced code quality.
I avoid async/await in JavaScript
Cory argues that async/await complicates JavaScript code, obscures optimization opportunities, increases cognitive load in error handling, and suggests promises are cleaner and more manageable for asynchronous operations.
Async hazard: MMAP is blocking IO
Memory-mapped I/O can cause blocking I/O in asynchronous programming, leading to performance issues. Conventional I/O methods outperform it unless data is cached in memory, highlighting risks in concurrent applications.
Async2 – The .NET Runtime Async experiment concludes
The .NET team's async2 experiment aims to enhance async/await efficiency by shifting management to the runtime, improving performance and exception handling, but may take years to become production-ready.