September 4th, 2024

Intel Core Ultra 200V promises Arm battery life without compatibility issues

Intel's next-generation Core Ultra processors, launching on September 24, 2024, promise improved battery life, power efficiency, and include a neural processing engine for AI tasks, with integrated RAM for efficiency.

Read original articleLink Icon
Intel Core Ultra 200V promises Arm battery life without compatibility issues

Intel has announced its next-generation Core Ultra processors, codenamed "Lunar Lake," set to launch on September 24. These processors, known as Intel Core Ultra (Series 2), aim to enhance power efficiency and battery life while providing modest performance improvements and faster graphics. A notable feature is the new neural processing engine (NPU) designed for generative AI and machine-learning tasks, which aligns with Microsoft's Copilot+ requirements. In comparative tests, Intel's Lunar Lake system demonstrated longer battery life than a Snapdragon X Elite system in office productivity scenarios, although Qualcomm's system outperformed Intel during Microsoft Teams calls. Intel emphasizes that x86 PCs do not face the compatibility issues that Arm-based systems do, which could sway users towards Intel if battery life improvements continue. The Lunar Lake processors utilize a new architecture with fewer chiplets and are manufactured by TSMC, marking a shift from Intel's previous mixed manufacturing processes. Additionally, the integration of system RAM into the CPU package is expected to enhance power efficiency. Intel is launching nine models in the Core Ultra 200V series, with variations based on integrated memory options.

- Intel's Core Ultra processors will launch on September 24, 2024.

- The new processors promise improved battery life and power efficiency.

- A neural processing engine is included for AI and machine-learning tasks.

- Intel claims better battery performance compared to Qualcomm in certain tests.

- The processors feature integrated RAM, enhancing power efficiency.

Link Icon 11 comments
By @rahen - 3 months
I would be interested in knowing how they achieved these improvements.

To me the main contributing factors to power efficiency are the architecture, very complex on x86, and the manufacturing process, which has hit a miniaturization wall.

All the low hanging fruits have long been taken on x86. How did they achieve this?

By @ranguna - 3 months
I'm confused, they say the minimum TDP is 8W. On a 99Wh battery, that's 12.375 hours I believe. My arm cpu phone goes below 5W all the time. I'm not sure 8W is going to cut it.
By @karmakaze - 3 months
"200V" is a terrible code to put in an efficiency product when inefficiency varies by voltage^2.
By @dur-randir - 3 months
What else would they tell their investors? "We suck at innovation, implementation, execution & delivery combined"?
By @h_tbob - 3 months
I would get this because honestly - I like working in Linux but have continued to use OS X simply because M1 has been untouchable with regards to battery life. This changes things and makes Linux a more viable option at a lower price than Asahi.
By @barryvan - 3 months
This sounds very promising, although I do have to wonder whether we could have seen these improvements many years ago if Intel (and AMD) had focussed more on efficiency.
By @high_na_euv - 3 months
Lunar Lake may start the process of slowing down ARM adoption

ARM ISA does not offer some significant magical performance or energy eff just by itself unlike many ppl tend to believe

By @taraharris - 3 months
I'd go for ARM anyway. I don't need to run binaries from the 90s
By @pcdoodle - 3 months
It would be cool if we got a system on a module (SOM) along side this. Sounds like it would mop the floor with a pi5 performance to watt wise.
By @pjmlp - 3 months
It just needs to be good enough to keep Windows on ARM irrelevant for most folks.