With more legal action on the horizon, how long before Archive.org closes?
The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled against the Internet Archive, stating its digital lending practices are not "fair use," raising concerns about its future amid ongoing legal challenges and potential damages.
Read original articleThe United States Court of Appeals has upheld a ruling against the Internet Archive in the ongoing legal battle with Hachette, affirming that the Archive's practice of scanning and distributing digital copies of copyrighted books without permission is not considered "fair use." The Internet Archive had previously launched a "National Emergency Library" during the COVID-19 pandemic, which allowed unlimited digital lending of scanned books, leading to the lawsuit. The court's decision emphasizes that the Internet Archive's arguments, including claims about the costs incurred in creating these digital copies, were not sufficient to justify their actions. The ruling poses significant challenges for the Internet Archive, which is already facing another lawsuit from Universal Music Group regarding unauthorized distribution of audio recordings. If the Internet Archive loses this case, it could face damages exceeding $412 million, a financial burden it may not be able to withstand. The future of the Internet Archive appears precarious, with potential for further legal actions against its extensive collection of copyrighted materials. The situation raises concerns about the sustainability of the Archive's services, which many users value, but which operate in violation of copyright laws.
- The U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled against the Internet Archive in a copyright case.
- The Internet Archive's digital lending practices were deemed not "fair use."
- The Archive faces a potential $412 million lawsuit from Universal Music Group.
- The future of the Internet Archive is uncertain due to ongoing legal challenges.
- The Archive's operations may be at risk due to copyright violations.
Related
Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win
The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.
Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers
An appeals court reviews Internet Archive's digital lending defended against copyright claims. 500,000 books removed, sparking debate. Court focuses on publishers' profits. Archive argues for fair use and equal access. Decision pending, could impact digital libraries and set copyright precedent.
Major book publishers defeat Internet Archive appeal over digital scanning
A U.S. appeals court ruled against the Internet Archive, stating its book scanning and lending practices do not qualify as "fair use," harming publishers and authors' incentives.
Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
The Internet Archive lost its appeal regarding ebook lending without publisher consent, with the court ruling that it undermines creator compensation. The Archive plans to continue advocating for library rights.
Internet Archive Loses Landmark eBook Lending Copyright Appeal Against Publisher
The Second Circuit Court ruled against the Internet Archive's digital book lending program, citing copyright infringement and rejecting fair use claims, emphasizing the need to protect publishers' rights.
The Internet Archive has lost its appeal in Hachette vs. Internet Archive - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41447758 - Sept 2024 (783 comments)
I think the fact a lot of sites are SPA or similar, and have bot blockers like Cloudflare is slowly killing their usefulness.
Um ... no. The ones putting The Internet Archive in danger are the copyright cartels and the laws that enable them. If you "love the internet archive", you should oppose the current copyright regime.
If you think that the Internet Archive is their own worst enemy and anyone who thinks differently is wrong, then you don't actually support the work of The Internet Archive. Sure, you may like parts of it. But you oppose its core mission.
I support changing the law to allow the The Internet Archive to operate. I am sad that the current laws (apparently) may not allow it to operate. I am not dunking on everyone who thought they have a reasonable legal case. Why? Because I "love the internet archive".
Given: 1. It may require a login, for which I already have a cookie in my everyday browser. 2. It may require complex Javascript, e.g. React applications. 3. It may require dismissing popups for: cookie consent, newsletters, optional logins or signup, etc. 4. It may require solving a captcha. I have no problem letting the script run in the background and grabbing my attention when a captcha is required.
The 2nd Court wasn't quite this bad, but if we want to write headlines, how about: "With more trash rulings, how long before the copyright system collapses?"
As ever, Mike Masnick/Techdirt have strongly polarized but great coverage. https://www.techdirt.com/2024/09/05/second-circuit-says-libr...
I say this as a user of the other stuff. I just built a site that relies on them to serve classic game assets (legally, because it's just the free demo)[1]. But I'd definitely prefer that they shut that down if it could keep the wayback machine on.
It may have always been inevitable that copyright laws would burn down our modern Library of Alexandria, but they didn't have to hand out torches like this.
Basically, get better at what you're already best at. Don't be the next Mozilla.
Related
Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win
The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.
Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers
An appeals court reviews Internet Archive's digital lending defended against copyright claims. 500,000 books removed, sparking debate. Court focuses on publishers' profits. Archive argues for fair use and equal access. Decision pending, could impact digital libraries and set copyright precedent.
Major book publishers defeat Internet Archive appeal over digital scanning
A U.S. appeals court ruled against the Internet Archive, stating its book scanning and lending practices do not qualify as "fair use," harming publishers and authors' incentives.
Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
The Internet Archive lost its appeal regarding ebook lending without publisher consent, with the court ruling that it undermines creator compensation. The Archive plans to continue advocating for library rights.
Internet Archive Loses Landmark eBook Lending Copyright Appeal Against Publisher
The Second Circuit Court ruled against the Internet Archive's digital book lending program, citing copyright infringement and rejecting fair use claims, emphasizing the need to protect publishers' rights.