Internet Archive Responds to Appellate Opinion in Hachette vs. Internet Archive
The Internet Archive is reviewing a court ruling that restricts its digital lending, resulting in the removal of 500,000 books, raising concerns about access to out-of-print works and copyright issues.
Read original articleThe Internet Archive expressed disappointment following a recent appellate court ruling regarding its digital lending practices, particularly concerning books that are available electronically elsewhere. The organization is currently reviewing the court's opinion and remains committed to defending libraries' rights to own, lend, and preserve books. The ruling has led to the removal of access to approximately 500,000 books from the Internet Archive's library, prompting calls for publishers to restore access. The decision has sparked discussions about the implications for out-of-print books and the responsibilities of publishers regarding access to their content. Critics of the ruling argue that it could hinder public access to historical and out-of-print works, while supporters of the decision emphasize the importance of copyright protections for authors and publishers. The Internet Archive is advocating for controlled digital lending as a means to preserve and provide access to valuable literary works, especially those that are no longer commercially available.
- The Internet Archive is reviewing a court ruling that limits its digital lending practices.
- Approximately 500,000 books have been removed from the Internet Archive's library due to the ruling.
- The decision raises concerns about access to out-of-print books and the responsibilities of publishers.
- The Internet Archive continues to advocate for controlled digital lending to preserve access to important literary works.
- The ruling has sparked debate over copyright protections versus public access to literature.
Related
Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win
The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.
Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers
An appeals court reviews Internet Archive's digital lending defended against copyright claims. 500,000 books removed, sparking debate. Court focuses on publishers' profits. Archive argues for fair use and equal access. Decision pending, could impact digital libraries and set copyright precedent.
Major book publishers defeat Internet Archive appeal over digital scanning
A U.S. appeals court ruled against the Internet Archive, stating its book scanning and lending practices do not qualify as "fair use," harming publishers and authors' incentives.
Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
The Internet Archive lost its appeal regarding ebook lending without publisher consent, with the court ruling that it undermines creator compensation. The Archive plans to continue advocating for library rights.
Big publishers think libraries are the enemy
The Second Circuit Court ruled against the Internet Archive's digital lending program, siding with publishers who claim it harms sales, raising concerns about censorship and access to information in libraries.
Recently though, it became possible to read them in a web browser without a DRM plugin. The viewing app is a typical javascript monstrosity but it is sort of usable, and in principle I could exfiltrate the data with Selenium or something. So I've been wondering if this change resulted from the IA's activities somehow.
Related
Internet Archive forced to remove 500k books after publishers' court win
The Internet Archive removed 500,000 books due to a court ruling favoring publishers. The organization is appealing, arguing for fair use. Supporters stress the impact on education and access to information.
Appeals court seems lost on how Internet Archive harms publishers
An appeals court reviews Internet Archive's digital lending defended against copyright claims. 500,000 books removed, sparking debate. Court focuses on publishers' profits. Archive argues for fair use and equal access. Decision pending, could impact digital libraries and set copyright precedent.
Major book publishers defeat Internet Archive appeal over digital scanning
A U.S. appeals court ruled against the Internet Archive, stating its book scanning and lending practices do not qualify as "fair use," harming publishers and authors' incentives.
Internet Archive loses appeal over eBook lending
The Internet Archive lost its appeal regarding ebook lending without publisher consent, with the court ruling that it undermines creator compensation. The Archive plans to continue advocating for library rights.
Big publishers think libraries are the enemy
The Second Circuit Court ruled against the Internet Archive's digital lending program, siding with publishers who claim it harms sales, raising concerns about censorship and access to information in libraries.