September 20th, 2024

Sipeed NanoKVM: A RISC-V stick-on

The Sipeed NanoKVM is a $50 remote control device for computers, operating independently but raising security concerns due to its proprietary OS and encountering bugs and compatibility issues during testing.

Read original articleLink Icon
Sipeed NanoKVM: A RISC-V stick-on

The Sipeed NanoKVM is a compact IP KVM device that allows remote control of computers over a network, even when they are locked or powered off. Priced at around $50, it is significantly cheaper than competitors, which can cost upwards of $200. The NanoKVM is built on the LicheeRV Nano platform and utilizes a RISC-V SG2002 SoC. Unlike traditional software KVMs, the NanoKVM operates independently, making it useful for managing servers without built-in remote access features. However, it runs on a proprietary operating system, which raises security concerns, especially since the source code is not currently open source. Sipeed has stated that they will open source the code after selling 10,000 units or receiving 2,000 stars on GitHub. While the device has potential, it has encountered issues during testing, including firmware bugs and compatibility problems with certain hardware. The author suggests that while the NanoKVM is an innovative and affordable option, it may not be suitable for mission-critical applications until further improvements are made.

- The Sipeed NanoKVM offers remote control of computers for $50, significantly cheaper than competitors.

- It operates independently of the host computer, making it useful for remote management.

- The device runs on a proprietary OS, raising security concerns due to lack of open-source code.

- Testing revealed several bugs and compatibility issues that need addressing.

- The author recommends caution for mission-critical use until the device is more refined.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @snvzz - 8 months
>Unlike the other IP KVMs I've used before, like PiKVM, BliKVM, or TinyPilot, the NanoKVM runs its own proprietary OS.

>And right now, at least, the source code isn't all open source. There's a long issue about it on GitHub, but the tl;dr? Sipeed said they won't open source the code until they either sell 10,000 units or get 2,000 stars on the repository.

Yeah, I'll sit on this one. Right now, the three listed are better options simply because they're Open Source.

The hardware is appealing. Should they actually open source the code early enough that their product still has a chance to be relevant, I will order a few.

Way to sabotage their product launch by not being OSS from the get-go.