Studio Ghibli composer sees AI-generated music as just imitations
Joe Hisaishi, the Studio Ghibli composer, doubts generative AI's music capabilities, stating it only imitates existing works and emphasizing that true innovation comes from human creativity, not artificial means.
Read original article
Joe Hisaishi, the renowned composer for Studio Ghibli, has expressed skepticism about the capabilities of generative AI in music composition. During a recent interview in San Francisco, he stated that AI-generated music merely imitates existing works and lacks the ability to create original compositions. Hisaishi has reportedly declined numerous requests to collaborate with AI, emphasizing that true musical innovation stems from human creativity rather than artificial replication. His comments reflect a broader concern within the artistic community regarding the role of AI in creative fields, where the distinction between imitation and genuine artistry is increasingly debated.
- Joe Hisaishi believes AI can only imitate human-created music.
- He has turned down multiple requests to compose music with AI.
- Hisaishi emphasizes the importance of human creativity in music.
- His views highlight concerns about AI's role in the arts.
Related
Pop Culture
Goldman Sachs report questions generative AI's productivity benefits, power demands, and industry hype. Economist Daron Acemoglu doubts AI's transformative potential, highlighting limitations in real-world applications and escalating training costs.
Artificial Intelligence Cheapens the Artistic Imagination
The rise of AI in visual arts may lead to significant job losses for artists, raising concerns about creativity's value and risking cultural depth as machines dominate creative processes.
We're in the brute force phase of AI – once it ends, demand for GPUs will too
Gartner highlights a transitional phase in AI development, emphasizing the limited use of generative AI and recommending a return to traditional methods and composite AI for more effective outcomes.
Don't ask if AI can make art – ask how AI can be art
The discussion on AI and art is evolving towards interactive experiences, emphasizing collaboration and unique expressions, while addressing concerns about quality, authorship, and responsible management of AI systems.
Sorry Ted Chiang, humans aren't original either
Ted Chiang's essay on AI art has sparked debate about originality, with Erik Hoel arguing that both human and AI creativity involve remixing ideas, emphasizing intentionality and consciousness in art.
1 commentsI think, if an AI can reach that point, we will see an explosion of astounding scientific and artistic progress.
Related
Pop Culture
Goldman Sachs report questions generative AI's productivity benefits, power demands, and industry hype. Economist Daron Acemoglu doubts AI's transformative potential, highlighting limitations in real-world applications and escalating training costs.
Artificial Intelligence Cheapens the Artistic Imagination
The rise of AI in visual arts may lead to significant job losses for artists, raising concerns about creativity's value and risking cultural depth as machines dominate creative processes.
We're in the brute force phase of AI – once it ends, demand for GPUs will too
Gartner highlights a transitional phase in AI development, emphasizing the limited use of generative AI and recommending a return to traditional methods and composite AI for more effective outcomes.
Don't ask if AI can make art – ask how AI can be art
The discussion on AI and art is evolving towards interactive experiences, emphasizing collaboration and unique expressions, while addressing concerns about quality, authorship, and responsible management of AI systems.
Sorry Ted Chiang, humans aren't original either
Ted Chiang's essay on AI art has sparked debate about originality, with Erik Hoel arguing that both human and AI creativity involve remixing ideas, emphasizing intentionality and consciousness in art.