September 21st, 2024

Datacenters bleed watts and cash – all because they're afraid to flip a switch

Datacenters can significantly reduce energy consumption by 25-50% through enabling power management features, which are often disabled due to performance concerns, without major impacts on performance for most workloads.

Read original articleLink Icon
Datacenters bleed watts and cash – all because they're afraid to flip a switch

Datacenters are facing significant challenges with power consumption, leading to increased operational costs. According to the Uptime Institute, enabling built-in performance and power management features in modern systems could reduce energy usage by 25 to 50 percent. Specifically, activating OS-level governors and processor C-states can significantly lower idle power consumption. However, these features are often disabled by default due to concerns about performance instability and latency. Uptime's analyst Daniel Bizo argues that for most workloads, particularly those not sensitive to latency, enabling these features can yield substantial energy savings without significantly impacting performance. The report suggests that modern servers often operate at levels of performance that exceed what is necessary for acceptable service quality, leading to unnecessary energy waste. While there are trade-offs between power savings and performance, a combination of software and hardware controls can optimize energy efficiency. The findings indicate that focusing on power consumption rather than maximum performance could lead to more sustainable datacenter operations.

- Datacenters can reduce energy consumption by 25-50% by enabling power management features.

- Processor C-states can lower idle power consumption by nearly 20%.

- Many power-saving features are disabled by default due to performance concerns.

- Most workloads can benefit from power management without significant performance loss.

- A balanced approach using both software and hardware controls can optimize energy efficiency.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @h2odragon - 2 months
Efficiency isn't even on the list of goals for many of them, I think. If your business is essentially to sell electrical power on a cost plus basis, why would you want your customers to use less?

I got to take a tour of a major DC in 2003. Heavy, impressive security, multiple buildings, and rack after rack after rack with a CRT sitting on top, showing a burned in desktop or the 3d pipes screensaver.

My host informed me that something like 30% of their systems were >5 years old, having been the DC of the company that had been took over by the company that he was now working for. As far as anyone knew, there was no business use for them, but no one had the brave to start pulling plugs.

My favorite part of that story is: after we went through the security and saw all the access controls; we went round to the back door, unguarded, propped open all the time for airflow. I parked my pickup and we hauled out several carts of hardware my host was donating, filling the truck. Never saw security in that part of the visit.

By @jart - 2 months
If there isn't enough power, then why don't power companies just make more power?

Why is it the tech industry's responsibility to consume less resources?

By @bigfatkitten - about 2 months
For colocation, it is common to pay a flat rate for power (up to a certain limit). Why would customers make any effort to use less?