September 23rd, 2024

Crypto Wars: Hungarian Presidency continues fight against encryption

The Hungarian Presidency of the EU Council is advocating for strategic encryption solutions, including a "front door" data request method, while addressing civil rights concerns and enhancing counter-terrorism cooperation.

Read original articleLink Icon
Crypto Wars: Hungarian Presidency continues fight against encryption

The Hungarian Presidency of the EU Council is advocating for a strategic approach to address encryption challenges, as outlined in a draft document from the Council. This initiative stems from the work of the EU High-Level Expert Group on Data Access for Effective Law Enforcement (HLEG), which aims to facilitate access to metadata and communication data from end-to-end encrypted services like WhatsApp and Signal. Belgium's Federal Police is proposing a "front door" method for law enforcement to request data directly from service providers without requiring back doors. The EU Commission plans to develop a roadmap for implementing these strategies, emphasizing the need for effective data access to combat crime. However, civil rights activists have raised concerns about potential overreach and the implications of such measures, warning against extreme decisions made without public scrutiny. The Hungarian government is also pushing for a comprehensive counter-terrorism agenda, enhancing cooperation among member states and addressing threats from disinformation and radicalization. Additionally, the EU is working on integrating various databases for security and border management, which could lead to the creation of a biometric super database. This ongoing effort reflects the EU's commitment to balancing security needs with fundamental rights.

- The Hungarian Presidency is pushing for a strategic approach to encryption issues in the EU.

- Belgium proposes a "front door" method for law enforcement data requests.

- Civil rights activists warn against extreme measures taken without public input.

- The EU aims to enhance cooperation on counter-terrorism and information sharing.

- Plans for a biometric super database are part of broader security and border management efforts.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @BLKNSLVR - 7 months
It's only possible to target services that have a central point of contact / administration. I don't want to invoke 'web 3.0' specifically, but the essentially headless decentralisation of encrypted communications services would be like trying to catch 'all the gas in the room' in your hand with a single clap, wouldn't it?

It feels like, even if they win this battle in the crypto wars, the real battleground has actually moved on anyway.

As an aside, that recent "Ghost Chat" infiltration[0][1] that apparently took down a few international crime gangs, wouldn't a Matrix / Synapse server and clients be a better option for encrypted communications than a custom phone/app?

[0]: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-17/afp-raids-ghost-app-f...

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41566948

By @aussieguy1234 - 7 months
Let me guess, its the usual justifications. CSAM, terrorism?

Well, if you give the government too much power, sooner or later they will become the child abusers and terrorists. And at that point, there will be no police you can really call, since those in power will be able to act with absolute power and absolute impunity.