Calgary community turns to restrictive covenants with blanket rezoning in effect
Residents of Lake Bonavista, Calgary, are pursuing restrictive covenants to block multi-family developments due to concerns over community character, with 15-20% participation so far amid legal and inclusivity debates.
Read original articleResidents of Lake Bonavista, a community in Calgary, are taking action to prevent the construction of multi-family developments following the city's blanket rezoning policy. This policy allows for various housing types in all residential areas, prompting concerns among homeowners about the potential disruption to their community's character. To counter this, residents have initiated a restrictive covenant initiative, which involves legally binding agreements that can prevent certain types of construction. Over 200 residents attended a recent meeting to discuss the initiative, with hopes that at least 60% of the community will participate to effectively block developers from creating larger multi-family projects. The initiative has already seen about 15-20% of households agreeing to register the covenants, which cost $500 each. Legal experts note that while restrictive covenants are not new to Calgary, their use is increasing in response to the new zoning laws. Critics, however, express concerns that such covenants may hinder the development of inclusive communities and affordable housing. The City of Calgary does not enforce these covenants, leaving their validity and enforcement to the homeowners involved.
- Lake Bonavista residents are implementing restrictive covenants to prevent multi-family developments.
- The initiative follows Calgary's blanket rezoning policy, which allows diverse housing types in residential areas.
- Approximately 15-20% of households have agreed to register the covenants, with a goal of 60% participation.
- Legal experts warn that restrictive covenants may limit housing supply and inclusivity.
- The City of Calgary does not enforce restrictive covenants, treating them as private agreements.
Related
Why Can't We Build Like It's the 1970s? (2022)
The decline in affordable housing construction in Canada since the 1970s is attributed to reduced federal funding, leading to a shift in responsibility to provinces. Despite recent investment efforts, construction remains insufficient. Experts advocate for increased federal funding and taxing real estate profits to address the housing crisis.
Rent Control Reduces New Development: Bug or Feature?
The article examines rent control's impact on housing development in California, highlighting concerns that it may deter new construction and alter community character, despite legal allowances for building new homes.
With Shared Software, Landlords Are Teaming Up to Raise Rents
San Francisco has banned RealPage to address rent collusion amid a housing crisis. The software's profit-driven approach exacerbates rising rents, prompting investigations and highlighting structural issues in the housing market.
No smoking in your own home, California city orders residents
Carlsbad, California, will ban smoking and vaping in multi-family residences starting January, aiming to improve public health. Enforcement relies on landlords and tenants, facing criticism for potential government overreach.
The Labyrinthine Rules That Created a Housing Crisis
Land-use regulations in the U.S. contribute to the housing crisis by enforcing outdated preferences and allowing few individuals to influence development. A shift to state-level management is suggested for better accountability.
The newer communities in Calgary were master planned to include SFD, Townhouses and Condos/Apartments, Lake Bonavista was built when density was not on the radar of any city planner as Calgary was 1/3 the size.
My biggest complaint about NIMBYism is this behavior. Why are current owners allowed to dictate so many rules about "the future"?
Related
Why Can't We Build Like It's the 1970s? (2022)
The decline in affordable housing construction in Canada since the 1970s is attributed to reduced federal funding, leading to a shift in responsibility to provinces. Despite recent investment efforts, construction remains insufficient. Experts advocate for increased federal funding and taxing real estate profits to address the housing crisis.
Rent Control Reduces New Development: Bug or Feature?
The article examines rent control's impact on housing development in California, highlighting concerns that it may deter new construction and alter community character, despite legal allowances for building new homes.
With Shared Software, Landlords Are Teaming Up to Raise Rents
San Francisco has banned RealPage to address rent collusion amid a housing crisis. The software's profit-driven approach exacerbates rising rents, prompting investigations and highlighting structural issues in the housing market.
No smoking in your own home, California city orders residents
Carlsbad, California, will ban smoking and vaping in multi-family residences starting January, aiming to improve public health. Enforcement relies on landlords and tenants, facing criticism for potential government overreach.
The Labyrinthine Rules That Created a Housing Crisis
Land-use regulations in the U.S. contribute to the housing crisis by enforcing outdated preferences and allowing few individuals to influence development. A shift to state-level management is suggested for better accountability.