Digital ID Isn't for Everybody, and That's Okay

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) discusses the implications of digital identification (ID) systems, such as mobile driver’s licenses (mDLs), which are being rapidly adopted without adequate privacy protections. While proponents argue that digital IDs offer convenience, they may lead to increased data sharing and surveillance, as they could be required in more situations than traditional IDs. The EFF emphasizes the need for individuals to retain the option of using physical IDs, as not everyone has access to the technology or the desire to transition to digital forms. The article highlights concerns about privacy, equity, and the potential for digital IDs to exacerbate existing inequalities, particularly for marginalized groups who may lack the necessary documentation or technology. It also warns against the assumption that digital IDs will simplify access to services, noting that many people still rely on physical documentation. The EFF calls for legislative protections to ensure that digital ID systems do not infringe on privacy rights or create barriers to essential services. Overall, the article argues that digital identity should not be seen as an inevitable solution for everyone, and that careful consideration and regulation are necessary to protect individuals' rights.

- Digital IDs may increase data sharing and surveillance beyond traditional ID use.

- Not everyone has access to the technology required for digital IDs, raising equity concerns.

- The transition to digital IDs could create barriers for marginalized groups lacking documentation.

- Legislative protections are essential to safeguard privacy rights in digital ID systems.

- Digital identity should not be viewed as an inevitable solution for all individuals.