October 3rd, 2024

Microsoft: 'ever present' AI assistants are coming

Microsoft's Mustafa Suleyman announced advanced personal AI assistants with long-term memory will launch within a year, addressing privacy concerns while introducing new features for CoPilot and relaunching Recall with enhanced security.

Read original articleLink Icon
Microsoft: 'ever present' AI assistants are coming

Microsoft's head of AI, Mustafa Suleyman, announced that personal AI assistants with advanced long-term memory capabilities are expected to be available within a year. These AI tools aim to enhance user interaction by recalling past conversations and personal data, thereby encouraging users to share more of their history. While proponents argue that deeper integration of AI into daily life is essential for its utility, critics raise concerns about privacy, data security, and the potential for biased or incorrect advice. Suleyman noted a shift in public expectations regarding privacy, citing the prevalence of devices that continuously record data. Despite skepticism about the widespread adoption of AI tools, he emphasized that AI is the fastest-growing technology in history. Microsoft has recently introduced new features for its AI assistant, CoPilot, including a voice function and a tool called CoPilot Vision, which assists users while browsing. However, the company faced backlash over a previous AI tool, Recall, which took screenshots for user assistance, leading to its temporary suspension. The tool is set to relaunch with enhanced security measures.

- Microsoft plans to release advanced personal AI assistants within a year.

- Concerns about privacy and data security are prevalent among critics.

- AI is considered the fastest-growing technology in history, despite mixed user adoption rates.

- New features for Microsoft's CoPilot include voice functions and browsing assistance.

- The Recall tool will relaunch with improved security after privacy concerns.

Link Icon 24 comments
By @peutetre - 7 months
> But AI supporters argue that in order to be truly useful, these tools have to be deeply embedded into our lives: that they can only be really helpful if they know the history and context behind what they are being tasked to do.

The problem is these AI assistants won't work for me, they'll work for Microsoft. They won't help me as much as they will point me in the direction that is the most profitable for Microsoft.

When the agenda is not mine then these things are of no use to me.

By @myprotegeai - 7 months
I can't wait until little Johnny's AI assistant (that's been with him since birth) can communicate to Big Tech's Global HR Overlord AI and they can decide together that a good job is not a privilege that a wrongthinker like Johnny should enjoy.
By @deergomoo - 7 months
Given this is Microsoft, I’ll assume the “whether you want them or not” is implied.
By @fldskfjdslkfj - 7 months
They misspelled "ever present user data collection"
By @noirscape - 7 months
I think what Suleyman is missing here is that most people aren't fine with their "TVs, laptops, in-car cameras and earbuds" recording everything continuously.

The most popular modification made to laptops is a small round sticker to seal off the webcam. The enshittification of the car market is something that only car manufacturers seem to like. The most common question with a smart TV is "how do I get that thing to just accept an HDMI input and not get in the way". Making a slight jump from car cams - things like doorbell cameras are facing increased scrutiny because of their inadvertent recording of the nearby street, which might violate privacy laws.

Adding audio and the few seconds before and after to a photo isn't the same thing as a continuous recording; the choice to make the photo is both still with the user and what's happening doesn't feel like a black box. AI assistants are the black box.

It was cute when Siri could tell you the nearest sushi bar or can check the schedule from your calendar (although I'll note that every use for Siri tends to be a party trick and half the fun people get from Siri and other assistants is when they don't work as expected; I don't know a single person who uses Siri to for example, read the news or give them a briefing on what's important for the day a-la Star Trek or other utopian scifi), it's creepy when Siri starts to suggest that you might want to visit a sushi bar because it's tracked your food habits for the past week and thinks you could enjoy some more fish food instead. AI assistants overwhelmingly are heading to the latter and now that the party trick element is cooling off, people get more cynical towards how they work (and how they don't work as advertised.)

By @fakedang - 7 months
Microsoft can't even be arsed to implement proper search in Windows 10/11, and they claim this.
By @rsynnott - 7 months
Oh, right, Microsoft says it? It’ll definitely happen, then. Their pronouncements about the future of computing are famously accurate. That’s why we’ve all been using Windows for Pen Computing since the noughties.
By @dspillett - 7 months
> But AI supporters argue that in order to be truly useful, these tools have to be deeply embedded into our lives

A tool controlled by corporates like Microsoft that deeply embedded into my life? If that is what it takes to be truly useful then I don't want it to be useful and will be opting out in every way possible. With force if needed…

By @croes - 7 months
It will be interesting to see when the first conviction based on this feature will take place.
By @karel-3d - 7 months
That's just Clippy
By @phkahler - 7 months
>> For example, an AI diary manager can only organise your diary if it can access that diary, edit it, and retain information about your activities.

Edit a diary? Retain the information? A diary IS a log of information as understood at the time. It's also not the clouds business, nor to be edited.

My gosh these people sound stupid.

By @jasonvorhe - 7 months
Never forget that most of Western governments pretty much run on Windows and Microsoft services.
By @drooopy - 7 months
How about you go back to making an OS that takes less than 10 GB of disk space, doesn't spy on me and is not filled with useless ads everywhere?
By @jerpint - 7 months
If these models could run offline, 100% locally, with expected privacy, Im up for it, i want to use a product, not be training data
By @NoGravitas - 7 months
The headline feels like a threat.
By @GiorgioG - 7 months
I expect we’ll look back on this in 5 years and laugh our asses off. AI offers glimpses of brilliance and then sprinkles a bunch of turds around it. 60% of the time it works every time.
By @Mountain_Skies - 7 months
The only thing really keeping me on Windows now is Visual Studio. I know there are alternatives on Linux but for my particular work, there's no substitute for the actual full pro version of Visual Studio. But this non-stop parade of enshitification of Windows is really making me think about going back to Linux for my daily driver outside of work tasks. I don't want to have to keep up with what privacy invasion Microsoft has cooked up this week and keep track of the current way to opt-out, if that's even possible. Since first installing Slackware in the mid 90s, I've done several multi-year stints with Linux as my desktop OS, so it wouldn't be a completely alien change but in general I've found Windows to be a bit easier day-to-day and gets in the way less. All this AI and snapshotting garbage, on top of the existing telemetry, is adding up to be too much.
By @pixelpoet - 7 months
I wish they would give a shit that nobody wants this and actively hates it. Please fuck off with your AI trash, big tech :(
By @agos - 7 months
I wonder if they realized how ominous it sounds
By @kaimac - 7 months
could be great news for linux adoption
By @JohnFen - 7 months
No no no. There is literally nothing about this that I find useful or acceptable, and a whole lot that I find dangerous and frightening. It's handing far too much power over to companies that I fundamentally don't trust.

I'm not getting on this train.

> AI supporters argue that in order to be truly useful, these tools have to be deeply embedded into our lives: that they can only be really helpful if they know the history and context behind what they are being tasked to do.

That cost is far too high.

By @xtiansimon - 7 months
First it was every online support had the idiot computer voice, Uh. Sorry. Please tell me again in a few words…

Now I’ve noticed all of these support services, once you get past the idiot computer, there is now an idiot human who rephrases your question or concerns to the point of stupidity, You’re calling because you’re having problems using the website…

Meanwhile, I’m waiting for sentiment analysis and an idiot computer telling me I sound frustrated, How are things at home? Are you having a bad day?

By @xarope - 7 months
MS Head of AI says there'll be more AI. News at 11.

In other news, MS Head of AI says Clippy is making a comeback...

By @guidedlight - 7 months
I don’t know why everyone is so concerned. Microsoft has been sending telemetry data and your photos to Microsoft for years.