October 5th, 2024

Task-Switching Experiment (2015)

Multitasking involves performing multiple tasks simultaneously or by switching rapidly. Research suggests women may excel in multitasking. An experiment assesses performance through a cued task-switching paradigm, collecting response data.

Read original articleLink Icon
CuriosityFrustrationInterest
Task-Switching Experiment (2015)

Multitasking is defined as performing multiple tasks simultaneously, sequentially, or by rapidly switching between tasks. Examples include driving while talking on the phone or preparing a meal. The concept is explored through experiments comparing single-task performance to multitasking, particularly in a cued task-switching paradigm. Research by Stoet et al. (2013) suggests that women may excel at switching between tasks compared to men. The implementation of this experiment involves participants responding to different shapes and colors while managing task-switching, with a focus on accuracy and response time. The experiment is designed to be challenging, requiring participants to remember rules for two tasks and switch between them frequently. Data from the experiment is recorded in a text file, detailing various metrics such as task type, response accuracy, and timing. Participants can run a demo of the task-switching paradigm, which takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete. The study aims to provide insights into cognitive performance in multitasking scenarios.

- Multitasking can involve simultaneous, sequential, or rapid task switching.

- Research indicates women may perform better than men in multitasking scenarios.

- The experiment uses a cued task-switching paradigm to assess performance.

- Data collected includes response accuracy and timing for analysis.

- Participants can engage in a demo to experience the task-switching challenge.

AI: What people are saying
The comments on the multitasking experiment reveal several insights and common themes among participants.
  • Participants express concerns about potential biases in the experiment due to fixed task order and fatigue.
  • Many users note that repeated testing can lead to improved performance as they become familiar with the tasks.
  • There is a recognition that real-world multitasking often involves different sensory inputs, contrasting with the experiment's design.
  • Some commenters share their personal experiences with multitasking in professional settings, highlighting the challenges of context switching.
  • Overall, there is a general interest in the experiment and its implications for understanding multitasking abilities.
Link Icon 10 comments
By @tgsovlerkhgsel - 3 months
Performing the test in fixed order creates a risk of bias due to either training or exhaustion. With a sufficiently big data set, it would be interesting to show the test to different groups in different orders, or at least repeat one of the "easy" tests at the end.

I noticed that my performance significantly dropped towards the end because my brain was just fried.

(Also, who else did the test while task-switching to HN while waiting for something to finish?)

By @makeitdouble - 3 months
It's so interesting to be able to run the experiment and see for one-self, especially if it's really a matter of 10-15min.

It should be noted that research in this domain is usually done with multi-sensory tasks (e.g https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31277054/), and not same channel input like this experiment. It better balances the cognitive load and it's also more realistic, as most people multi-tasking will be using different resources, for instance filling a form while on the phone, or sitting a team meeting while releasing in production.

By @hippari2 - 3 months
This is fun but I supposed you should not take this test more than a few times. After a while I notice that I read the whole ( shape, filling, position) as an input and it's quite a bit faster than initial timing.
By @LoganDark - 3 months
> For example, no matter how deeply you concentrate on doing a task, if you hear someone shout "fire", you will process that information and act on it.

Not necessarily with Dissociative Identity Disorder! (Or dissociative disorders in general)

By @hislaziness - 3 months
The screen seems to be stuck at Wait a second... for me.
By @dtran - 3 months
https://www.psytoolkit.org/experiment-library/experiment_mul... for the actual runnable experiment. Shared my results below (I'm pretty tired at the moment so don't feel my sharpest)— super curious what others got.

I've been trying to eliminate multi-tasking as much as I can, but the nature of startups day-to-day and even what seems like a single/monotask when zoomed out now often involves context switching (For say, investigating and fixing a user-reported bug, I might have to toggle between VSCode, localhost in browser + the DOM inspector or console, our bug tracker, our support ticketing tool, Slack, and sometimes the Cody window in VS Code/ChatGPT/Claude:

  RT in pure trials: 448ms
  RT in mixed trials: 710ms
  Mixing cost: 262ms
  RT in task-repeat trials (in mixed blocks): 710ms
  RT in task-switching trials (in mixed blocks): 975ms
  Task-switch cost: 265ms
By @Balaakay - 3 months
Very interesting. I will take some time tonight to run the demo. I am a big believer in not switching tasks if it can be avoided. I loved Cal Newport's book "A World Without Email" which discusses context switching in the 'information worker' space as something that brings productivity to a halt. I believe he is right.
By @quzyp - 3 months
.

  RT in pure trials: 511ms
  RT in mixed trials: 804ms
  Mixing cost: 293ms

  RT in task-repeat trials (in mixed blocks): 804ms
  RT in task-switching trials (in mixed blocks): 1026ms
  Task-switch cost: 222ms
I think this is very easy to "train" and would expect to see significant improvements on the second and third attempt.