The Strict Aliasing Situation Is Pretty Bad (2016)
Strict aliasing rules in C and C++ can hinder compiler optimizations and lead to undefined behavior when pointers are misused. Using the -fno-strict-aliasing flag and checking tools is recommended.
Read original articleThe article discusses the implications of strict aliasing rules in C and C++, which can hinder compiler optimizations due to the potential for pointers to alias. The strict aliasing rule allows compilers to assume that pointers of different types do not point to the same memory location, enabling better optimization. However, this can lead to undefined behavior when programmers cast pointers inappropriately, such as accessing a floating-point value through an integer pointer. The article highlights several issues arising from strict aliasing, including broken physical subtyping in struct-based inheritance, challenges with chunking optimizations, and the potential for unexpected behavior when using non-character types like int8_t and uint8_t. It emphasizes that many C programs may inadvertently violate these rules, leading to unpredictable results, especially when optimizations are enabled. The author suggests that static and dynamic checking tools are necessary to ensure code correctness and recommends using the -fno-strict-aliasing flag when writing correctness-oriented C code. Overall, the article underscores the need for caution when dealing with strict aliasing in C and C++ to avoid subtle bugs and undefined behavior.
- Strict aliasing rules can prevent compiler optimizations due to potential pointer aliasing.
- Violating strict aliasing can lead to undefined behavior in C and C++ programs.
- Many existing C programs may inadvertently break strict aliasing rules.
- Using the -fno-strict-aliasing flag is advisable for correctness-oriented C code.
- Static and dynamic checking tools are essential for ensuring code correctness.
Related
I _____ hate arrays in C++
The article explores challenges in using arrays in C++, focusing on array-to-pointer conversion pitfalls, differences from pointers, and practical examples of errors. Caution and awareness are advised for C++ developers.
Clang vs. Clang
The blog post critiques compiler optimizations in Clang, arguing they often introduce bugs and security vulnerabilities, diminish performance gains, and create timing channels, urging a reevaluation of current practices.
The difference between undefined behavior and ill-formed C++ programs
The article explains the difference between undefined behavior and ill-formed programs in C++. It highlights the risks of ill-formed no diagnostic required programs and suggests tools for mitigation.
Undefined behavior in C is a reading error (2021)
Misinterpretations of undefined behavior in C have caused significant semantic issues, risking program stability and making C unsuitable for critical applications. A clearer standard interpretation is needed for reliable programming.
Lesser known tricks, quirks and features of C
The article explores lesser-known C programming features, including the comma operator, designated initializers, compound literals, and advanced topics like volatile qualifiers and flexible array members, highlighting their potential pitfalls.
Here is why I don’t blame the developers: writing fast, efficient systems code that satisfies the requirements of strict aliasing as defined by C/C++ is surprisingly difficult. It has taken me years to figure out the technically correct incantations for every weird edge case such that they always satisfy the requirements of strict aliasing. The code gymnastics in some cases are entirely unreasonable. In fairness, recent versions of C++ have been adding ways to express each of these cases directly, eliminating the need to use obtuse incantations. But we still have huge old code bases that assume compiler behavior, as was the practice for decades.
I am not here to attribute blame, I think it the causes are pretty diffuse honestly. This is just a part of the systems world we failed to do well, and it impacts the code we write every day. I see strict aliasing violations in almost every code base I look at.
int foo(int *x) {
*x = 0;
// wait until another thread writes to *x
return *x;
}
Can the C compiler really optimize foo to always return 0? That seems extremely unintuitive to me.The Strict Aliasing Situation Is Pretty Bad - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11288665 - March 2016 (67 comments)
Related
I _____ hate arrays in C++
The article explores challenges in using arrays in C++, focusing on array-to-pointer conversion pitfalls, differences from pointers, and practical examples of errors. Caution and awareness are advised for C++ developers.
Clang vs. Clang
The blog post critiques compiler optimizations in Clang, arguing they often introduce bugs and security vulnerabilities, diminish performance gains, and create timing channels, urging a reevaluation of current practices.
The difference between undefined behavior and ill-formed C++ programs
The article explains the difference between undefined behavior and ill-formed programs in C++. It highlights the risks of ill-formed no diagnostic required programs and suggests tools for mitigation.
Undefined behavior in C is a reading error (2021)
Misinterpretations of undefined behavior in C have caused significant semantic issues, risking program stability and making C unsuitable for critical applications. A clearer standard interpretation is needed for reliable programming.
Lesser known tricks, quirks and features of C
The article explores lesser-known C programming features, including the comma operator, designated initializers, compound literals, and advanced topics like volatile qualifiers and flexible array members, highlighting their potential pitfalls.