October 11th, 2024

AMD Instinct MI325X to Feature 256GB HBM3E Memory, CDNA4-Based MI355X with 288GB

AMD announced updates to its Instinct GPUs, introducing the MI325X with 256GB memory and 6 TB/s bandwidth, and the MI355X with 288GB memory and 8 TB/s bandwidth, launching in 2025.

Read original articleLink Icon
AMD Instinct MI325X to Feature 256GB HBM3E Memory, CDNA4-Based MI355X with 288GB

AMD has announced updates to its Instinct series of GPUs, specifically the MI325X and MI355X models. The MI325X will feature 256GB of HBM3E memory, a reduction from the previously planned 288GB due to difficulties in securing the necessary memory stacks. This model will still provide a memory bandwidth of 6 TB/s and has a thermal design power (TDP) of up to 1000W. In contrast, the upcoming MI355X, set for release in the second half of 2025, will utilize the newer CDNA4 architecture and will include 288GB of HBM3E memory, with an increased bandwidth of 8 TB/s. The MI355X will also support new data types such as FP4 and FP6 and will be manufactured using a more advanced 3nm process. Additionally, AMD has confirmed plans for a future MI400 model based on the CDNA-Next architecture, expected to launch in 2026, although specific details about its specifications have not yet been disclosed.

- AMD's MI325X will have 256GB of HBM3E memory and a bandwidth of 6 TB/s.

- The MI355X will feature 288GB of HBM3E memory with an 8 TB/s bandwidth, targeting NVIDIA's Blackwell GPUs.

- The MI325X has a TDP of up to 1000W, while the MI355X will be built on a 3nm process.

- AMD plans to release the MI400 model in 2026, with no specifications available yet.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @roenxi - 6 months
The part here I find funny is that AMD's market cap currently sits at @ 2x Intel's so the analysts of the world obviously think they're sitting on something. And yet they are still in headlines as the market underdog.

For anyone who doesn't follow AMD at all (good move, their consumer support for compute leaves scars) they appear to have a strategy of targeting the server market in hopes of scooping out the high-profit part of the GPGPU world. Hopefully that does well for them, but based on my years of regret at being an AMD customer watching the AI revolution zoom by, I'd be hesitant about that translating to good compute experiences on consumer hardware. I assume the situation is much improved from what I was used to, but I don't trust them to see supporting small users as a priority.

By @IanCal - 6 months
This isn't so directly related, and I know that performance figures are highly workload dependent and always under the headline figures but I want to take a moment to point out the multi-petaflop figures. Yes they're not full precision, but still. How long ago would this have felt like an outrageous supercomputer?

Quick thing to show the sheer scale of these figures. This is 10^15 operations per second, and if you sit a foot from your screen that takes light about a nanosecond to reach you. That means that from the light leaving your screen to it hitting your eyeballs these things can have done another million calculations.

I know this isn't particularly constructive, but I'm hit with waves of nostalgia and older performance figures seeing this.

By @jamesblonde - 6 months
The price is good compared to Nvidia H100 or B100 at around $15k.
By @jauntywundrkind - 6 months
Supposedly last in the line of CDNA? AMD said they are switching to a new Unified DNA/UDNA in the future, merging both Radeon/consumer and Compute/data-center. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/amd-announce...