October 12th, 2024

The Pettiest Drama in the Tech World Is Taking Place at... WordPress?

Matt Mullenweg criticized WP Engine for exploiting WordPress, leading to a cease-and-desist letter and a lawsuit from WP Engine against Mullenweg and Automattic, raising concerns about conflicts of interest.

Read original articleLink Icon
The Pettiest Drama in the Tech World Is Taking Place at... WordPress?

Matt Mullenweg, co-founder and CEO of Automattic, has engaged in a public dispute with WP Engine, a major client that utilizes WordPress' open-source code for its hosting services. The conflict began when Mullenweg criticized WP Engine during WordCamp U.S., accusing it of exploiting WordPress without adequately contributing to the ecosystem. He specifically targeted Silver Lake, the private equity firm that owns WP Engine, suggesting it prioritizes profit over open-source values. This led to a series of aggressive statements from Mullenweg, including a call for the WordPress community to withdraw support from WP Engine. In response, WP Engine sent a cease-and-desist letter, alleging that Mullenweg threatened to launch a public campaign against them unless they paid a significant sum to Automattic. The situation escalated with Mullenweg announcing WP Engine's ban from the WordPress nonprofit network, which was later temporarily lifted after backlash from users. The dispute has raised concerns about Mullenweg's dual role in both the commercial and nonprofit aspects of WordPress, leading to accusations of conflicts of interest. WP Engine has since filed a lawsuit against Mullenweg and Automattic, claiming extortion and other serious allegations, while Automattic has dismissed the lawsuit as meritless.

- Matt Mullenweg publicly criticized WP Engine for not supporting the WordPress ecosystem adequately.

- WP Engine responded with a cease-and-desist letter, alleging threats from Mullenweg.

- The conflict has raised concerns about Mullenweg's dual role in WordPress' commercial and nonprofit sectors.

- WP Engine has filed a lawsuit against Mullenweg and Automattic, claiming extortion and defamation.

- The situation highlights tensions between open-source ideals and corporate interests in the tech industry.

Link Icon 3 comments
By @PaulHoule - 6 months
Not surprised at all. There is a lot at stake in terms of money and usage but practically nothing technologically which is ground zero for this sort of thing. (E.g. if there was a lot at stake technologically there would be a fork or a competitive product —- practically though the reason why people make Wordpress blogs and Wordpess splogs and why they are always trying to hack your blog to make it a splog is because Google learned how to index Wordpress well back when it thought blogs mattered. Invent some new blogging software and it won’t do as well for SEO.)
By @nis0s - 6 months
IMO, companies profiting off of opensource projects as part of that company’s business model should contribute financially to sustain the opensource project.

Why should opensource maintainers be expected to act altruistically in this scenario? Parasitic behavior poisons goodwill in opensource communities, and prevents future innovation and effort.

By @bookofjoe - 6 months