October 12th, 2024

With 'Megalopolis,' the Flop Era Returns to Cinemas

Francis Ford Coppola's "Megalopolis" debuted with $4 million against a $140 million budget, labeled an "auteurist flop," prompting discussions on the disconnect between artistic merit and box office success.

Read original articleLink Icon
With 'Megalopolis,' the Flop Era Returns to Cinemas

Francis Ford Coppola's film "Megalopolis," a long-anticipated project that he financed by selling part of his wine business, has opened to disappointing box office results, earning only $4 million in its debut weekend. The film, which cost approximately $140 million to produce and market, is characterized as an "auteurist flop," a term used to describe ambitious films by renowned directors that fail commercially despite their artistic aspirations. Coppola, now 85, has faced various challenges during the film's production, including allegations of on-set misconduct and a lawsuit related to these claims. Critics have drawn parallels between "Megalopolis" and other historical flops like "Heaven's Gate," noting that while Coppola's reputation remains intact, the film's failure highlights a cultural fascination with the downfall of celebrated filmmakers. Observers argue that the perception of a film's worth should not be solely tied to its box office performance, as personal vision and artistic integrity can sometimes lead to financial losses. The discourse surrounding "Megalopolis" reflects broader themes in Hollywood regarding the nature of success and failure in filmmaking.

- "Megalopolis" opened to only $4 million, despite a $140 million budget.

- The film is seen as an "auteurist flop," a term for ambitious films by renowned directors that fail commercially.

- Coppola's reputation remains secure despite the film's poor performance.

- The film's failure has sparked discussions about the relationship between a film's artistic merit and its box office success.

- The narrative of celebrated filmmakers facing failure is a recurring theme in Hollywood history.

Link Icon 1 comments
By @adamredwoods - 4 months
>> “That is a determinant of what makes a good investment,” Brody added. “It is not a determinant of what makes a good film.”

Coppola is no Fellini, nor a Michael Bay. I feel film artists lose their ability to make art when their brain is infected by money and power. This happened to Spielberg and Lucas. It's okay. It's how Hollywood unfolds. Coppola should have restricted his budget and hired someone who is brave enough to tell him when he's wrong.

Creativity blossoms under constraint.