October 13th, 2024

Explaining Falling Birth Rates

David Friedman attributes declining birth rates in developed countries to changing norms in mate search, diminished status of child-rearing, acceptance of same-sex relationships, and modern living standards affecting fertility trends.

Read original articleLink Icon
Explaining Falling Birth Rates

David Friedman discusses the declining birth rates in developed countries, attributing them to several interrelated factors. One significant factor is the changing norms surrounding mate search, particularly in professional and academic settings, where dating among colleagues or students is often discouraged. This limits opportunities for individuals to form romantic relationships, which can lead to lower birth rates. Additionally, societal perceptions of traditional roles, such as being a housewife, have shifted, resulting in lower status associated with child-rearing compared to professional success. The increasing acceptance of same-sex relationships also plays a role, as same-sex couples may opt for adoption rather than biological children. Friedman notes that the historical Malthusian model of population growth is no longer applicable due to modern birth control and higher living standards, which have led to fertility rates falling below replacement levels. He suggests that certain cultural groups, such as the Amish and Haredi, maintain higher birth rates, potentially influencing future demographics. However, he acknowledges that the rapid changes in society may complicate predictions about future fertility trends.

- Changing norms in mate search limit romantic opportunities.

- Societal views on traditional roles have diminished the status of child-rearing.

- Acceptance of same-sex relationships may lead to lower biological birth rates.

- Modern living standards and birth control have altered historical population growth models.

- Certain cultural groups maintain higher birth rates, potentially affecting future demographics.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @jncfhnb - 6 months
Seems quite clueless to open up this article with suggesting mate search norms.

The answer is birth control and deteriorating economic conditions. About half of pregnancies are unplanned today still.

By @Axsuul - 6 months
Another significant factor, perhaps even more influential, is the shifting priorities of the younger generation regarding child-rearing. Today's potential parents place a greater emphasis on providing an optimal environment for their children compared to previous generations. There's a growing consciousness about the importance of ensuring that any child brought into the world is guaranteed a stable home and secure living situation. And with increased living and housing costs now, it makes sense why lots of young people are delaying children until those conditions are met, if ever.
By @naveen99 - 6 months
I feel like measuring fertility rates before women finish menopause is misleading and underestimates projected fertility rate. If you look at actually fertility rates at menopause, it’s close to 3, well above replacement: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147264831...
By @api - 6 months
None of these are good explanations. They're all either red herrings or Western-centric. Birth rates are falling in all cultures among all races with all religions and all belief systems. Only the rate of decline differs, and not by that much.

Another post pointed out that it correlates strongly with urbanization, which is better, but it still couldn't resist getting lost in irrelevant culture war stuff that clearly doesn't matter else we wouldn't see such uniform declines across all cultures.

The depopulation discourse drives me nuts because it seems like everyone jumps on their favorite culture war or economic hobby horse instead of looking at what is actually happening, which clearly rules a lot of that out.

By @reducesuffering - 6 months
I believe social safety nets and long term savings, in part, shoulder some of the blame. For most of history, there was no state or pension to rely on for medical care, goods, and services in your late age. You had to have children if you wanted to be supported at all and not die in poverty at 65. Now, people think it'll be ok not to have kids, because they'll still have their government health care or retirement funds to sustain them, assuming stability for the next 40 years.