October 14th, 2024

The Age of PageRank Is Over (2022)

The decline of the PageRank algorithm is attributed to ad-driven models prioritizing revenue over quality. A user-centric approach is essential for restoring trust and improving web search results.

Read original articleLink Icon
The Age of PageRank Is Over (2022)

The article discusses the decline of the PageRank algorithm, originally developed by Sergey Brin and Larry Page, which transformed web search by prioritizing merit-based links. Over the years, the rise of ad-supported business models led to a conflict of interest, where search engines prioritized ad revenue over delivering quality search results. This shift resulted in a web dominated by a few large sites, filled with ads and low-quality content, ultimately degrading the user experience. The author argues that the current state of the web is detrimental to society, as it manipulates user preferences and undermines the original intent of the internet. The piece advocates for a user-centric approach to search, suggesting that future search engines must abandon ad-based models to regain public trust and improve information quality. The vision includes personalized search assistants that align with user needs, offering tailored recommendations without the noise of advertisements. The author believes that this shift is inevitable as users become more aware of the importance of quality information and the harmful effects of current monetization strategies.

- PageRank's original merit-based model has been compromised by ad-driven business models.

- The dominance of ads has led to a decline in the quality of web search results.

- A user-centric approach to search is necessary for restoring trust and improving information quality.

- Future search engines may offer personalized assistants that prioritize user needs over ad revenue.

- The shift away from ad-supported models is seen as essential for the internet to reach its full potential.

Link Icon 12 comments
By @Fordec - 6 months
Can the script on this then be flipped? Build a search engine, clearly smaller in scope and commercial utility, that if a site links to a payment or ad network, de-rank it heavily. Then the end result should be in theory, filled with what one would consider the "old" internet, primarily blogs and sites not trying to sell you things or abuse your data.

None of the large companies would do it, but that would be the point.

By @jaronilan - 6 months
Always found the concept of PR intriguing and the original paper to be “foundational”.

I wrote an alternate reality fiction short story about PR and SEO. It is here: https://github.com/jaronilan/stories/blob/main/Duplicitous.p...

Not the most “popular topic”, but thought people around HN might find it interesting.

By @geenat - 6 months
I'm not convinced Google has stopped using backlinks and other classic pagerank attributes for search ranking.
By @trod123 - 6 months
There are some subjects that are personal that no one will be comfortable searching for while its tied to a billing address (i.e. any login).

Abortion in some states for example. It doesn't matter what any company says right now, the position is clear that the tune can and often does change the moment its inconvenient for them.

Paying for the privilege of being targeted is crazy talk.

By @ben30 - 6 months
When colleagues ask questions in Slack, I sometimes paste Kagi's search summary. Quick and usually spot-on.

Funny thing is, I've told the team about Kagi, but not everyone's willing to pay/see the benefits yet. Meanwhile, I'm wondering why they're asking if a good search engine could answer it so easily.

By @syndicatedjelly - 6 months
Amazingly prescient. The original version of that article was written in 2019
By @ricardo81 - 6 months
I used to get sent a monthly cheque for $1K around the turn of the millennium simply to have a link on my home page, such was the power of Pagerank back then. This was handy as it allowed me to invest time into learning web development, plus the site was educational and paid for its existence.

Producing content was harder back then and the web was a lot smaller. Google most definitely still use links to rank but are much more likely to discount/devalue links than they did historically.

By @cryptos - 6 months
I like the idea to pay for quality content - or search results. If you don't pay for it, someone else will and the "sponsor" will probably have different objectives than you. So, you won't get the best information and it would be likely to waste money because of that (e.g. buying an advertised low-quality product).
By @dang - 6 months
Discussed at the time:

The Age of PageRank Is Over - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33537513 - Nov 2022 (373 comments)

By @28304283409234 - 6 months
I will do you one better though, given my conversation with teenagers this weekend: Pagerank is dead, because webpages are dead.

The only moment these kids use a search engine is when they do homework. In any and every other moment they just search "locally" in TikTok, or insta.

It scares the shit out of me.

(Edit: paying kagi customer here! Keep it up, kagi! I still love and need you!)

By @alex_suzuki - 6 months
(2022)