Why you should use Go
The author praises Go for its simplicity, robust standard library, and efficiency in full-stack development, highlighting benefits like single binary deployments and effective concurrency, making it a practical programming choice.
Read original articleThe author reflects on their journey with Go programming language, emphasizing its advantages over other languages, particularly in web development. After starting in frontend development with React, the author became frustrated with the constant updates and complexity of modern frameworks. They appreciate Go for its simplicity, minimalistic syntax, and the convergence of solutions across projects, which allows developers to focus on building products rather than debating coding styles. The standard library is highlighted as robust and reliable, reducing the need for external libraries. The author also discusses the benefits of using Go for full-stack development, particularly with tools like Templ that facilitate a hypermedia-driven approach. They mention the ease of database management with tools like sqlc, the joy of single binary deployments, and Go's efficient concurrency model. Performance is another strong point, as Go applications tend to be resource-efficient. Overall, the author advocates for Go as a practical choice for developers looking for a straightforward and effective programming experience.
- Go's simplicity and minimalistic syntax make it easy to learn and use.
- The standard library provides a comprehensive set of tools, reducing reliance on external libraries.
- Go is well-suited for full-stack development, promoting a hypermedia-driven approach.
- Single binary deployments simplify the deployment process and reduce resource usage.
- Go's performance and efficiency can lead to cost savings in cloud resource usage.
Related
Go is my hammer, and everything is a nail
Markus, a solo developer, exclusively uses Go for software development, valuing its simplicity and versatility. He believes focusing on one language enhances productivity and deepens expertise without limiting career options.
A Love Letter to Go
The author reflects on 12 years with Go, praising its simplicity, performance, and concurrency, while suggesting improvements in data structure handling and broader use in data science and machine learning.
Golang – when programmers had smaller egos
The article contrasts the utilitarian ethos of Go, created by Google, with modern programmers' focus on personal branding, advocating for a balance between ambition and practicality in software development.
Some Go Web Dev Notes
Julia Evans discusses her experience with Go, highlighting improvements in routing, the sqlc tool for SQL queries, SQLite optimization tips, and Go's memory management, praising its simplicity and ease of use.
Some Go web dev notes
Julia Evans discusses her experiences with Go, highlighting improvements in routing, the sqlc tool for database interactions, SQLite optimization tips, and the benefits of Go's simplicity and memory management features.
The proponents of go seem to have an almost cult-like devotion to simplicity. They think adding any facility for abstraction makes a language into a complicated mess like C++, and any type system feature that didn’t exist in C makes a language into an ivory tower academic plaything like Haskell. The way the author talks about spending all day writing a perfectly beautiful, inscrutable piece of Rust code is an example of that. Yes, there are a few things in rust that are a bit harder to understand, but not to such an exaggerated extent, and that strawman is really not the typical experience when writing Rust. It’s very unusual for an experienced user of any mainstream language (except C++) to have any real difficulty understanding what a given piece of code does.
My list: Mostly fits in my head, gc, not horribly slow, boring concurrency, low effort cross-compilation, good distribution story.
It's contentious but I like the "low abstraction ceiling". Go punishes people who want to turn everything into a framework or abstraction and rewards people who just knuckle down and write the code that solves the actual problem instance.
Is it the "best" programming language on any single axis? Absolutely not. Are the ergonomics right for getting stuff done? Yep, at least for this commenter.
it’s not a bad language, but i would not choose it for a new project or base my company around it
I've come to realize that the amount of useless abstractions we add just because the language lets us, instead of thinking more deeply about what exactly is the problem we're facing, is just insane.
I would say the major strength of Golang is practical community which tends to avoid elegant complexity. The downside is pointers and the lack of null-safety.
I’ve watched from the sidelines over the years. I hear more people talk about it than use it.
Related
Go is my hammer, and everything is a nail
Markus, a solo developer, exclusively uses Go for software development, valuing its simplicity and versatility. He believes focusing on one language enhances productivity and deepens expertise without limiting career options.
A Love Letter to Go
The author reflects on 12 years with Go, praising its simplicity, performance, and concurrency, while suggesting improvements in data structure handling and broader use in data science and machine learning.
Golang – when programmers had smaller egos
The article contrasts the utilitarian ethos of Go, created by Google, with modern programmers' focus on personal branding, advocating for a balance between ambition and practicality in software development.
Some Go Web Dev Notes
Julia Evans discusses her experience with Go, highlighting improvements in routing, the sqlc tool for SQL queries, SQLite optimization tips, and Go's memory management, praising its simplicity and ease of use.
Some Go web dev notes
Julia Evans discusses her experiences with Go, highlighting improvements in routing, the sqlc tool for database interactions, SQLite optimization tips, and the benefits of Go's simplicity and memory management features.