Visual Studio Code vs. Sublime Text: Which code editor should you use?
Visual Studio Code is a free, open-source editor with extensive features and a strong extension ecosystem, while Sublime Text is fast but requires a paid license. Both support multiple languages.
Read original article
Visual Studio Code (VS Code) and Sublime Text are two prominent code editors, each with unique strengths. VS Code is a versatile, open-source editor that supports multiple programming languages and offers extensive features such as IntelliSense, debugging, and Git integration. It is free to use and regularly updated, with a rich ecosystem of extensions, including AI-powered tools like GitHub Copilot. In contrast, Sublime Text is known for its speed and efficiency, making it ideal for quick edits and code browsing. It supports over 70 file types and offers features like multiple selections, split windows, and a customizable interface. However, it requires a paid license for continuous use. Both editors are available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, and recent alternatives like Zed and Cursor are emerging, enhancing the coding experience with AI capabilities. Users are encouraged to try both editors to determine which best suits their workflow, as preferences may vary based on the nature of the tasks.
- Visual Studio Code is free and open-source, with extensive features and a strong extension ecosystem.
- Sublime Text is fast and efficient, ideal for quick edits, but requires a paid license for continuous use.
- Both editors support multiple programming languages and are available on major operating systems.
- New alternatives like Zed and Cursor are emerging, offering enhanced AI capabilities.
- Users are advised to experiment with both editors to find the best fit for their coding needs.
Related
Modern IDEs are magic. Why still use Vim, Emacs? (2020)
The enduring Vim vs. Emacs debate reflects users' resistance to change and preference for familiar tools. Vim's simplicity and customization attract efficiency-focused users, while some find switching to IDEs challenging. Personal preference determines the choice between traditional editors and modern IDEs.
Cursor – The AI Code Editor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that enhances developer productivity through predictive editing, natural language coding, and a focus on privacy, receiving positive feedback for its efficiency and user experience.
Show HN: Void, an open-source Cursor/GitHub Copilot alternative
Void is an open-source AI code editor, a VS Code fork, offering intelligent search, autocomplete, local model hosting, and direct LLM communication, while encouraging community contributions for feature development.
Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture
Geoffrey Huntley discusses the complexities of Visual Studio Code's open-source status, highlighting legal risks for unofficial versions and the shift towards subscription-based services in the developer ecosystem.
Copilot vs. Cursor vs. Cody vs. Supermaven vs. Aider
Vincent Schmalbach prefers Cursor over GitHub Copilot for its effective code modification and autocomplete features, while Aider serves command-line users. Sourcegraph Cody is less reliable for code modifications.
4 commentsbinary releases of VS Code without MS branding/telemetry/licensing
Related
Modern IDEs are magic. Why still use Vim, Emacs? (2020)
The enduring Vim vs. Emacs debate reflects users' resistance to change and preference for familiar tools. Vim's simplicity and customization attract efficiency-focused users, while some find switching to IDEs challenging. Personal preference determines the choice between traditional editors and modern IDEs.
Cursor – The AI Code Editor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that enhances developer productivity through predictive editing, natural language coding, and a focus on privacy, receiving positive feedback for its efficiency and user experience.
Show HN: Void, an open-source Cursor/GitHub Copilot alternative
Void is an open-source AI code editor, a VS Code fork, offering intelligent search, autocomplete, local model hosting, and direct LLM communication, while encouraging community contributions for feature development.
Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture
Geoffrey Huntley discusses the complexities of Visual Studio Code's open-source status, highlighting legal risks for unofficial versions and the shift towards subscription-based services in the developer ecosystem.
Copilot vs. Cursor vs. Cody vs. Supermaven vs. Aider
Vincent Schmalbach prefers Cursor over GitHub Copilot for its effective code modification and autocomplete features, while Aider serves command-line users. Sourcegraph Cody is less reliable for code modifications.