October 30th, 2024

Sketchy financials send Supermicro auditors running for the hills

Supermicro's stock fell over 30% after EY resigned as auditor due to financial reporting concerns. The company faces a whistleblower lawsuit, a Justice Department investigation, and risks Nasdaq delisting.

Read original articleLink Icon
Sketchy financials send Supermicro auditors running for the hills

Supermicro's stock plummeted over 30% after Ernst & Young (EY) resigned as its auditor, citing concerns about the reliability of the company's financial reporting. EY's resignation followed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that Supermicro misreported revenues by prematurely booking sales and billing for incomplete orders. The U.S. Justice Department is reportedly investigating the company, which has not filed its 10-K annual report for over two months, risking delisting from Nasdaq. EY's resignation letter highlighted issues with governance and transparency, particularly regarding CEO Charles Liang's influence over the board. In response, Supermicro formed a special committee and engaged forensic accountants to review its internal controls. However, EY's findings raised further questions about the company's commitment to integrity. Supermicro disputes EY's reasons for resigning, asserting that the special committee's review is ongoing. The company is now seeking a new accounting firm, but its history of financial reporting issues, including a previous SEC settlement for accounting violations, complicates its situation.

- Supermicro's shares dropped over 30% following EY's resignation as auditor.

- Ernst & Young cited concerns about the reliability of Supermicro's financial reporting.

- The company faces a whistleblower lawsuit and a U.S. Justice Department investigation.

- Supermicro has not filed its 10-K report, risking delisting from Nasdaq.

- The firm disputes EY's resignation reasons and is seeking a new accounting firm.

Link Icon 7 comments
By @anonymousiam - 6 months
Less than four months ago there was a lot of hype urging people to buy SMCI. Can anybody really trust the financial news outlets these days?

https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/07/13/is-super-micro-com...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/investor-hub/article/is-super-m...

https://investorplace.com/2024/03/smci-stock-alert-does-this...

By @StressedDev - 6 months
This is not surprising. Hindenburge Research (a short seller) documented SuperMicro’s problems in August 2024 (https://hindenburgresearch.com/smci/).
By @fdlaks - 6 months
They used to give out a calendar every year filled with pictures of their executives (mainly CEO) living a lavish lifestyle. Posing with Ferrari's, ribbon cutting ceremonies, stepping onto the company private jet, etc...

You could always tell when investors or potential customers were in town because the SMCI parking lot would suddenly have brightly colored sports cars parked right out front of the office, only to vanish shortly after until the next high profile meeting.

I always thought this was strange, but chalked it up to it being a cultural difference on how business is done in Asia vs the USA, but apparently not. GoPro used to do the same thing at their office in San Mateo back when the stock wasn't circling the drain, two Ferrari's parked right outside the front door as you walked into the building. Appearances can often be deceiving I guess.

By @arminiusreturns - 6 months
Supermicro and Asus are just about the only ones who make the motherboards I need in my COTS on-prem/dc stuff. Why don't more manufacturers target the server x64 market? It's sorely needed. I've built entire systems with SM, but they've long had issues, there just aren't many alternatives in the space.
By @WorkerBee28474 - 6 months
This was also content in today's Money Stuff [0]. Middle section, "Super Micro".

[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-10-30/florid... or https://archive.is/SGhLe

By @johnklos - 6 months
I'm not surprised about this at all. In spite of having plenty of actually decent products and good demand, the company has a history of acting shady and caring more about perceived appearance than about doing the right thing.

For instance, they appear to care about security issues that publicly embarrass them or that affect huge customers of theirs, issues that'd've been trivial to fix, instead of fixing issues for the sake of fixing them. This kind of "sales" based security and their responses have forced me to encourage multiple companies to use other vendors.