October 31st, 2024

AMD Introduces Next-Generation AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor

AMD launched the Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor, enhancing gaming performance with 8% improvement over its predecessor, featuring 2nd Gen 3D V-Cache, and priced at $479 for gamers and creators.

Read original articleLink Icon
AMD Introduces Next-Generation AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor

AMD has launched the Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor, a new addition to its desktop computing lineup aimed at enhancing gaming performance. This processor is built on the "Zen 5" architecture and incorporates 2nd Gen AMD 3D V-Cache technology, which features a 64MB cache memory positioned below the processor to improve cooling and performance. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers an average gaming performance increase of 8% over its predecessor and up to 20% faster than competitors. It is designed for extreme overclocking and is the first X3D processor to be fully unlocked, allowing users to maximize its capabilities. The processor boasts eight cores, 16 threads, a base clock speed of 4.7 GHz, and a maximum boost clock of 5.2 GHz, with a total cache of 104MB and a thermal design power (TDP) of 120W. AMD has partnered with game developers, including Activision and Saber Interactive, to optimize gaming experiences using this new processor. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is priced at $479 and is positioned as a leading solution for gamers and creators seeking high-performance computing.

- AMD has introduced the Ryzen 7 9800X3D processor, enhancing gaming performance.

- The processor features 2nd Gen AMD 3D V-Cache technology and is based on the "Zen 5" architecture.

- It offers an average gaming performance improvement of 8% over the previous generation.

- The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is fully unlocked for extreme overclocking.

- It is priced at $479 and targets gamers and content creators.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @culopatin - 6 months
My computer is not even one year old and my 7800x3d is already two numbers behind? Wow.

Turns out it was all a waste because I haven’t played anything anyway, being an adult and all

By @fancyfredbot - 6 months
Let's be honest, putting the hottest part at the top of the chip where it can be in contact with the heatsink is not the kind of thing AMD could have failed to think about until now. There's surely some reason why they didn't do it this way in previous generations? Does anyone know why?
By @rowanG077 - 6 months
I would really love to see some kind of PoC of running fully in cash a program. Having 104mb of you can run some performance critical stuff entirely from cash.
By @thfsilvab - 5 months
I'm very curious on why games benefit so much from a 50% larger L3 cache, I'm checking the technical aspects of Ryzen 7 9800X3D and Ryzen 9 9950X, L1 and L2 caches are smaller in the X3D one while the L3 cache is bigger.

Can someone help me better understand this? Okay, the CPU can move more things to the cache die when building the frames, less memory fetch, but it seems the performance difference is too big (according to the reviews) for +32MB L3 when comparing those two CPUs.

64MB of L3 on 9950X is still A LOT of cache.

By @Sohcahtoa82 - 5 months
Really looking forward to 3rd party benchmark results.

Hoping to replace my i9-9900K this generation, but the Intel Core 9 Ultra 285K was incredibly disappointing, and the Ryzen 9 9950 wasn't that great, either.

Only 8 cores seems a bit of a let down, when the 9950 has 16, but apparently it parks half the cores during high load which seems to defeat the purpose of having so many cores, so maybe it's not a big deal.

By @zaptrem - 5 months
Why did they mention "gaming performance" (i.e., frame rate change which isn't always directly connected to CPU performance) and not absolute performance (across a range of benchmarks)? The latter is more meaningful.