November 2nd, 2024

Breaking the image: a 12th-century AI Weiwei?

The article explores 12th-century Sussex murals, particularly "The Deception of Eve and Adam," highlighting their challenge to artistic norms and censorship, paralleling contemporary artist Ai Weiwei's provocative works.

Read original articleLink Icon
Breaking the image: a 12th-century AI Weiwei?

The article discusses the audacious nature of the 12th-century murals created by a Sussex muralist, particularly focusing on the piece titled "The Deception of Eve and Adam." This work is compared to contemporary artist Ai Weiwei's provocative piece "Dropping a Han Dynasty Urn," both of which challenge traditional views of art and iconography. The murals at Hardham depict historical martyrs, such as Saint George and Lazaros Zographos, who faced severe consequences for their defiance against established artistic norms. The Sussex artist's work is seen as a tribute to these figures, reflecting a commitment to creativity despite potential backlash. The trompe l'oeil technique used in "The Deception of Eve and Adam" raises questions about the nature of representation in art, blurring the lines between reality and illusion. The article suggests that both the medieval artist and Ai Weiwei share a vision of art that seeks to dismantle old conventions to pave the way for new interpretations. Ultimately, the Hardham murals faced censorship and were whitewashed, yet they remain a significant record of artistic rebellion and the complexities of sacred imagery.

- The Sussex muralist's work parallels Ai Weiwei's iconoclastic approach to art.

- "The Deception of Eve and Adam" employs trompe l'oeil to challenge perceptions of sacred imagery.

- Historical martyrs depicted in the murals symbolize the risks of artistic defiance.

- The murals were censored shortly after their creation, highlighting the tension between innovation and tradition.

- The article invites viewers to reconsider the value and meaning of art beyond its surface.

Link Icon 5 comments
By @countrymile - 21 days
I've not seen this particular mural, but if you ever find yourself near an English country church in the middle of no where you will most probably find it unlocked, and inside, an ark of art built up over generations (now, often, sitting uncared for). Originally the the catholic churches would have been brightly coloured with statues and stained glass. The reformation led to the smashing of the glass and statues. You will find baptismal fonts with the faces of the saints chiselled off. And the whitewashing of walls. Occasionally you'll stumble on wall paintings discovered whilst stripping the plain white paint off. Duffy's "the stripping of the altars" provides a rich overview of the church before and during the Tudor reformation.
By @vessenes - 21 days
I’m trying to parse the ‘shocking’ part of the Adam and Eve image. I think I understand pretty well why Ai Weiwei’s Han vase piece got the reaction it did, and what he was trying to do with it. But, I can’t help but feel our essayist here is holding back.

I’d be interested in some art historian’s perspectives on this — is there some controversy on the idea that this is a painting of a tapestry? If so, what’s the implication? What’s the shock part? I guess he’s perhaps trying to help us see it as a similar image of ‘breakage’ in which case, what, is this tapestry itself supposed to be hung in God’s or the devil’s house in the hamptons? Maybe the essay is just a bit of insider baseball, but I feel like I missed the hook.

By @KaoruAoiShiho - 21 days
CMV: Johnny Somali is the Ai Weiwei of our times.
By @aardvark179 - 21 days
I was very confused by the HN headline because it subtly changed the capitalisation of the original. Ai Weiwei is quite different to AI Weiwei.
By @dash2 - 21 days
The article seems to be arguing that this 12th century artist thought about their art in just the same way as contemporary artists. That seems unlikely somehow.