Trudeau government bans TikTok from operating in Canada
The Canadian government has ordered TikTok to cease operations due to national security concerns, but Canadians can still use the app. TikTok plans to challenge this decision in court.
Read original articleThe Canadian government has ordered TikTok to cease its operations in Canada due to national security concerns, following a review by the national security and intelligence community. Despite the shutdown of TikTok's offices in Toronto and Vancouver, Canadians will still be able to access and use the app. Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne emphasized that the decision was made to protect national security, although he did not disclose specific details. He advised Canadians to use the app cautiously, as there are fears that user data could be accessed by the Chinese government. TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, plans to challenge the order in court, arguing that the closure will result in job losses and is not in the best interest of Canadians. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has previously warned about the risks associated with TikTok, particularly regarding data privacy and potential government access to user information. This decision follows earlier actions by the Canadian government, including banning TikTok from government devices and conducting a broader review of social media platforms.
- The Canadian government has banned TikTok from operating in Canada due to national security concerns.
- Canadians can still access and use TikTok despite the shutdown of its Canadian offices.
- The decision was based on a national security review and advice from security agencies.
- TikTok plans to challenge the government's order in court, citing job losses.
- CSIS has warned about the risks of data privacy related to TikTok usage.
Related
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data protection concerns. Legal disputes continue as ByteDance faces pressure to sell TikTok's US assets by January to avoid a ban.
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data security concerns. Legal battles persist over potential divestment from ByteDance. Reports suggest data sharing between TikTok and ByteDance.
TikTok collected US user views on issues like abortion and gun control
The U.S. Justice Department accuses TikTok of collecting sensitive data and facilitating communication with ByteDance in China, raising national security concerns. TikTok contests the allegations and potential ban.
Coalition steps up calls to ban TikTok over links to China
The Coalition in Australia is pushing for a TikTok ban over concerns of Chinese interference, while the government monitors US developments and reviews TikTok's data practices and privacy protections.
The TikTok Case Will Be Determined by What's Behind the Government's Black Lines
The U.S. government defends a potential TikTok ban citing national security risks from ByteDance, while TikTok challenges the evidence's credibility, raising First Amendment concerns and proposing a special master for transparency.
- Many commenters argue that the focus should be on comprehensive data protection laws rather than targeting TikTok specifically.
- There is skepticism about the effectiveness of the ban, with some suggesting it may lead to job losses without addressing the core issues of data security.
- Several users express concerns about the lack of transparency from the government regarding national security claims.
- Some commenters highlight the double standards in how different social media platforms are treated, questioning the motivations behind the ban.
- There are calls for a more open approach to foreign media rather than outright bans, emphasizing the importance of countering misinformation with more information.
Perhaps the way to get anti-regulation politicians on board with this is for someone to do what was done to Robert Bork and legally disclose lots of personal info on members of Congress/Parliament, obtained from data brokers and de-anonymized.
I’m technically Gen-Z (but just barely) and this is something that really worries me. It’s become increasingly normal in recent times to share absolutely everything online but I’ve got a pretty grim feeling that this isn’t gonna end well. People don’t realize that the AI’s being trained on your data today will act as an internet history that you can never delete.
The public will probably never find out the scope of ByteDance’s operations in Canada for the Chinese government, but if it follows the same arc as other Chinese operations in Canada, I expect it is far more pervasive and frightening than one might expect. This isn’t about the app. This is about the offices.
For too long these foreign companies have been "shaping public opinion" - to quote a sibling comment here, who I think accurately sums up at least some of the reasoning behind this kind of development.
In case there's some ambiguity here - I am being sarcastic. I hope Ireland doesn't do that. I have strong issues with some of the above platforms and companies, but governments getting involved like this is nothing to be cheered.
Now the company can continue to operate. Canada has no hold on them. Canadian jobs lost. What is the gain?
They should insist that the data doesn't leave their borders; this is the opposite of a ban. They're insisting on having all their user data leave.
Government being stupid. Imagine that.
Being open and willing to accept foreign media (even when it's of low quality or propagandistic) is an advantage of genuinely open societies.
Bad speech can be countered with more speech, and media from western countries can easily be seen on VPNs in countries with heavy censorship. Bans only play to more repressive societies who can claim equivalence.
A better approach is to monitor the activity and narratives promoted and counter them. Chinese propaganda is usually ham handed and low quality anyway.
As an European those double standards and American exceptionalism (the idea that common laws and rules do not apply to US) will never cease to bother and annoy me.
A big part of that is how the media is used to push a particular narrative. Every US tech company plays ball with the US government and moves in lockstep with US foreign policy.
The threat of Tiktok (to Western governments) is that allows users to see things that other platforms bury, downrank, outright block or otherwise censor.
A big example of this was the train derailment in East Palestine, OH [2] last year. I reember for at least a week seeing things about the chemical spill, the evacuations and the smoke from the burn (which was visible from space) and I saw absolutely nothing on mainstream media.
You see this in the last year where what's happening on the Middle East manages to get out on Tiktok in a way it really doesn't on IG, Youtube or Facebook [3]. Information simply cannot be tolerated to move as freely as this, hence the scare campaign about Chinese control of Tiktok.
That's why you don't see any effort to, say, have a data protection regime. The goal is to control what you're allowed to see.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent
[2]: https://www.wired.com/story/east-palestine-ohio-train-derail...
[3]: https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/...
Second, if the company is as dangerous as they say, they are doing a huge disservice to citizens by withholding that information and handicapping our ability to make an informed choice about using the app.
Pushing their operations out of Canada also reduces their accountability footprint to subsequent lawsuits or legislation.
This is a weird half-measure and I have trouble making sense of it.
I am sure that Canadians will totally do this.
However that's not the endgame. I believe the current phase is simply gathering data and creating personal profiles accurate enough to imitate humans. With a bit of progress in AI those imitations will be used to create videos on the fly, tailored to each user. Those videos won't be limited by laws of physics or common sense, and this will give them an impressive insidious power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Fore...
Interesting timing on that one...
"Your starting date is April 24, 2024 so that means that 270 days later would be January 19, 2025."
Edit
On a second read (it's been a long day) they're closing offices but not banning the app, my comment is worthless. But feel free to check out the genz subreddit and get appalled but what's being said there
Where is the outrage then?
TikTok is blocked in China because it's deemed to be harmful to their citizens.
Essentially, he's using China to distract from his own policy failings at home.
[1] https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-says-he-has-list-of-...
"I'm not at liberty to go into much detail, but I know Canadians would understand when you're saying the government of Canada is taking measures to protect national security, that's serious."
In other words, Canadian government saying, "Just trust us, bro".
People worry about 'data exfiltration', but that is exactly what these products are - collect data about the users and sell it to advertisers.
Where the servers are located is of very little consequence in my opinion.
Yeah, I mind that 'my data' (whatever that might be) is stored on a communist hard drive and there's a brain washed data scientist running ideological queries through it.. The issue is not the ideology, but the fact that someone is running queries through my data collected while I'm using the digital drug to later manipulate me.
(Canadian founder in unrelated domain)
Therefore, surprise, surprise, Trudeau censors it now the day after the US election.
that said, banning their operations appears to remove any legal leverage the govt might have with the company while still dealing with the app being installed everywhere, which seems clumsy. with less than a year left in office the govt probably doesn't have any remaining runway for strategy, so this may just be posturing. there are a lot of ways to look at it.
cynically I might speculate there could be a domestic surveillance/interception rationale for making them close their operations, as the app is a full communications platform and if it backhauls to a domestic regional data centre, the federal agencies need warrants to do interception and would have to give their monitoring tech to the chinese company on their premises, whereas if the traffic is international, they can do mass interception using their existing mandates.
Now I am not dismissing they are using algorithm to manipulate what users see, but doesn't our social networks do the same thing? Yes, China also bans our social networks. But I can't help but see we are no better.
Related
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data protection concerns. Legal disputes continue as ByteDance faces pressure to sell TikTok's US assets by January to avoid a ban.
TikTok confirms it offered US Government a 'kill switch'
TikTok offered a "kill switch" to the US government amid data security concerns. Legal battles persist over potential divestment from ByteDance. Reports suggest data sharing between TikTok and ByteDance.
TikTok collected US user views on issues like abortion and gun control
The U.S. Justice Department accuses TikTok of collecting sensitive data and facilitating communication with ByteDance in China, raising national security concerns. TikTok contests the allegations and potential ban.
Coalition steps up calls to ban TikTok over links to China
The Coalition in Australia is pushing for a TikTok ban over concerns of Chinese interference, while the government monitors US developments and reviews TikTok's data practices and privacy protections.
The TikTok Case Will Be Determined by What's Behind the Government's Black Lines
The U.S. government defends a potential TikTok ban citing national security risks from ByteDance, while TikTok challenges the evidence's credibility, raising First Amendment concerns and proposing a special master for transparency.