November 7th, 2024

Bird flu infections undetected

Recent CDC findings reveal overlooked H5N1 infections among farmworkers, with eight of 115 tested showing antibodies. The agency recommends testing all exposed workers to prevent virus spread and mutations.

Read original articleLink Icon
Bird flu infections undetected

Recent findings from the CDC indicate that H5N1 bird flu infections among farmworkers are being overlooked, particularly in dairy cattle settings. A study involving blood samples from 115 farmworkers in Michigan and Colorado revealed that eight individuals had antibodies indicating recent infections, with half recalling illness coinciding with sick cows. The CDC's serological surveys highlight the need for increased testing among farmworkers, as many lack health insurance and paid sick leave, which hampers public health tracking efforts. The agency now recommends testing all exposed workers, regardless of symptoms, to identify and treat infections early. Despite the findings, there is no evidence suggesting that the H5N1 strain has developed the ability to spread between humans. The CDC emphasizes the importance of minimizing the virus's spread to prevent potential mutations that could increase its danger. However, challenges remain, including farmers' reluctance to cooperate with public health officials and the practical difficulties of implementing protective measures in extreme working conditions. The CDC continues to seek a better understanding of H5N1's impact on farmworkers and is collaborating with veterinarians to conduct further testing.

- CDC study finds undetected H5N1 infections among farmworkers.

- Eight out of 115 tested showed evidence of recent infection.

- New recommendations call for testing all exposed workers, regardless of symptoms.

- No evidence of person-to-person transmission of H5N1 detected.

- Challenges include farmers' reluctance to cooperate and harsh working conditions.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @timr - 6 months
> The agency believes the virus continues to pose a low risk to the general public.

They buried the lede. This is story about testing people who work in dairy farming, and finding out that a small number of people had inconsequential infections.

For those who will surely try, you can't just divide 8 (number of infections) by 115 (total population tested) and use that proportion for anything. The error bars are large (specifically, using Fisher's Exact, from 3% to 13%).

Edit: while the original Stat title is atrocious clickbait, a truly non-fear-mongering title would be something like "Asymptomatic bird flu infections in a small sample of farm workers"

By @GrantMoyer - 6 months
Any chance we could just stop raising so many cows and chickens?
By @cduzz - 6 months
Curious how this is going to play out over the next 18 months.
By @amluto - 6 months
The current H5N1 outbreak has been going on for a few years, and the US already has a pretty good system for (slowly) vaccinating around half the population against the flu. And the US just switched from a quadravalent to a trivalent seasonal flu vaccine because one of the Influenza B strains seems to have disappeared. Would it have made sense to instead keep it quadravalent and add H5N1 to the mix?