November 12th, 2024

The race to commercialise nuclear-powered batteries

Nuclear-powered batteries are gaining popularity for applications like pacemakers and sensors due to advancements in efficiency and longevity. Tritium and other isotopes are being explored for commercial development.

Read original articleLink Icon
The race to commercialise nuclear-powered batteries

Nuclear-powered batteries, which utilize the energy from radioactive isotopes, are gaining traction for commercial applications due to recent technological advancements. These micronuclear devices, producing microwatts to nanowatts of electricity, are particularly suited for powering sensors in extreme environments or locations without sunlight. Their long lifespan, ranging from decades to hundreds of years, makes them ideal for applications such as pacemakers, infrastructure monitoring, and space exploration. Recent innovations include a new design that significantly enhances the efficiency of converting americium-243 decay into usable power, achieving an 8000-fold increase in efficiency compared to previous models. Companies like City Labs are focusing on tritium-based batteries, which have a 12-year half-life and can be produced in scalable quantities. Other isotopes, such as promethium-147 and nickel-63, are also being explored for their potential in commercial devices. The growing interest in these technologies is driven by their unique advantages, including consistent power output regardless of environmental conditions, making them suitable for long-term missions in space or remote monitoring applications. As various organizations and governments invest in this technology, a competitive landscape is emerging in the race to develop and commercialize nuclear batteries.

- Nuclear batteries are suitable for long-term applications like pacemakers and sensors in extreme environments.

- Recent advancements have significantly improved the efficiency of nuclear battery designs.

- Tritium is a key focus for commercial nuclear battery development due to its availability and safety.

- Other isotopes like promethium-147 and nickel-63 are also being explored for their potential.

- Increased interest from governments and research organizations indicates a competitive race in nuclear battery technology.

Link Icon 6 comments
By @crescit_eundo - 5 months
By @moffkalast - 5 months
I can already hear 50s music playing on a stereo with not enough bass.
By @DeathArrow - 5 months
I wonder how much they cost and how efficient they are compared to other ways to produce electricity.
By @lnsru - 5 months
Sounds like another recycling nightmare to me. To the endless stream of electronic thrash come radioactive materials polluting everything for hundred years. The use cases do not convince me either. Why eternal battery when cheap electronics will fail earlier anyway.
By @cyberax - 5 months
The USSR "commercialized" nuclear-powered batteries to power the navigational beacons in the Arctic. And we're still cleaning up the consequences.

A pacemaker is better served by a modern rechargeable battery with inductive transcutaneous charging.

By @m3kw9 - 5 months
For space travel