New secret math benchmark stumps AI models and PhDs alike
Epoch AI has launched FrontierMath, a challenging benchmark for AI and mathematicians, with leading models solving under 2% of its expert-level problems, highlighting current AI limitations and requiring human expertise.
Read original articleEpoch AI has introduced FrontierMath, a new mathematics benchmark that poses significant challenges for AI models and expert mathematicians alike. The benchmark consists of hundreds of expert-level problems that leading AI models, including GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, reportedly solve less than 2% of the time. This stark contrast to their performance on simpler benchmarks, where many models score above 90%, highlights the limitations of current AI capabilities. FrontierMath's problems are designed to be unpublished to prevent AI companies from training their models on them, ensuring a more accurate assessment of their problem-solving abilities. Developed in collaboration with over 60 mathematicians, the problems span various mathematical disciplines and have undergone peer review for correctness. Notably, the problems require complex solutions that are difficult to guess, making them particularly challenging for AI systems. Mathematicians like Terence Tao have acknowledged the difficulty of these problems, suggesting that solving them may require a combination of human expertise and AI assistance. Epoch AI plans to conduct regular evaluations of AI models against this benchmark and will release additional sample problems in the future to further aid research in this area.
- FrontierMath is a new benchmark that challenges AI models and mathematicians with expert-level problems.
- Leading AI models solve less than 2% of FrontierMath problems, contrasting with their high performance on simpler benchmarks.
- The benchmark's problems are unpublished to prevent AI training on them, ensuring a fair assessment.
- Developed with input from over 60 mathematicians, the problems span multiple disciplines and require complex solutions.
- Epoch AI plans to regularly evaluate AI models and expand the problem set in the future.
Related
AI solves IMO problems at silver medal level
Google DeepMind's AI systems, AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2, solved four out of six International Mathematical Olympiad problems, achieving a silver medalist level, marking a significant milestone in AI mathematical reasoning.
Google DeepMind's AI systems can now solve complex math problems
Google DeepMind's AI systems, AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2, solved four of six problems from the International Mathematical Olympiad, achieving a silver medal and marking a significant advancement in AI mathematics capabilities.
We're Entering Uncharted Territory for Math
Terence Tao discusses AI's evolving role in mathematics, highlighting OpenAI's o1 series as a tool for complex tasks, enhancing collaboration, and emphasizing AI's complementary role to human mathematicians.
Apple researchers ran an AI test that exposed a fundamental 'intelligence' flaw
Apple researchers found that many AI models struggle with basic arithmetic when irrelevant data is included, highlighting a lack of genuine logical reasoning and cautioning against overestimating AI's intelligence.
FrontierMath: A benchmark for evaluating advanced mathematical reasoning in AI
FrontierMath is a new benchmark for evaluating AI's advanced mathematical reasoning, revealing that current models solve under 2% of expert-level problems, highlighting a significant capability gap. Regular evaluations are planned.
Here it is both literally true, and critical to the usefulness of the "benchmark". Which is a math test. A math test which the AI's do not get to cheat on, by having seen in their training sets. A math test which the top AI's perform extremely poorly on.
Added: For the top AI's, "stumped" means that they could not solve even 2% of the problems. Vs. for the PhD's, "stumped" means that they needed hours or days to solve the problems. Very different outcomes.
Retrieving a solution that happens to exist in a large database is not the same as "solving" the problem --- though it can appear otherwise to the ill-informed.
Related
AI solves IMO problems at silver medal level
Google DeepMind's AI systems, AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2, solved four out of six International Mathematical Olympiad problems, achieving a silver medalist level, marking a significant milestone in AI mathematical reasoning.
Google DeepMind's AI systems can now solve complex math problems
Google DeepMind's AI systems, AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry 2, solved four of six problems from the International Mathematical Olympiad, achieving a silver medal and marking a significant advancement in AI mathematics capabilities.
We're Entering Uncharted Territory for Math
Terence Tao discusses AI's evolving role in mathematics, highlighting OpenAI's o1 series as a tool for complex tasks, enhancing collaboration, and emphasizing AI's complementary role to human mathematicians.
Apple researchers ran an AI test that exposed a fundamental 'intelligence' flaw
Apple researchers found that many AI models struggle with basic arithmetic when irrelevant data is included, highlighting a lack of genuine logical reasoning and cautioning against overestimating AI's intelligence.
FrontierMath: A benchmark for evaluating advanced mathematical reasoning in AI
FrontierMath is a new benchmark for evaluating AI's advanced mathematical reasoning, revealing that current models solve under 2% of expert-level problems, highlighting a significant capability gap. Regular evaluations are planned.