When the U.S. Forest Service's budget shrinks, who pumps campground toilets?
The U.S. Forest Service faces significant budget cuts, risking essential services and exacerbating staffing shortages. Nonprofits are stepping in to assist, highlighting reliance on them amid uncertain national forest management.
Read original article
The U.S. Forest Service is facing significant budget cuts that threaten essential services in national forests, including the maintenance of campground toilets. As Congress deliberates on the federal budget, the Forest Service anticipates losing at least half a billion dollars from its requested $8.9 billion budget, which could lead to a suspension of seasonal hiring and further exacerbate staffing shortages. This situation has already resulted in a backlog of maintenance tasks, such as trail clearing and toilet pumping, which are critical for public health and safety. The Bridger-Teton National Forest (BTNF) in Wyoming exemplifies these challenges, where a nonprofit group, Friends of the Bridger-Teton, has stepped in to assist with essential services like toilet pumping at a fraction of the cost quoted to the Forest Service. This partnership highlights the increasing reliance on nonprofit organizations to fill gaps left by federal budget constraints. The looming cuts and the expiration of supplemental funding from previous legislation further complicate the Forest Service's ability to manage its vast 3.4 million acres of public land effectively. As the deadline for a comprehensive budget approaches, the future of national forest management remains uncertain.
- The U.S. Forest Service is facing budget cuts that threaten essential services.
- Staffing shortages are leading to a backlog in maintenance tasks in national forests.
- Nonprofit organizations are increasingly filling gaps left by federal budget constraints.
- The Bridger-Teton National Forest has partnered with a nonprofit to maintain essential services.
- The future of national forest management is uncertain as Congress deliberates on the budget.
Related
US Forest Service proposes protections for old-growth trees, without logging ban
The US Forest Service proposes protecting old-growth trees in national forests, allowing public input but not enforcing a logging ban. Concerns arise over loopholes and lack of specific guidelines. President Biden's order aims to restrict logging, with ongoing updates planned.
'Primed to Burn:' Former Parks Canada Scientist Fears for Banff
Banff, Alberta, faces an escalating wildfire threat due to inadequate forest management and climate change. Experts urge immediate action for better mitigation strategies to protect residents and visitors.
U.S. national park system gets a $100M grant, the largest in its history
The National Park Foundation received a historic $100 million grant from Lilly Endowment Inc. to enhance national parks, focusing on youth access, ecosystem conservation, and inclusive narratives for visitors.
The Forest Service Is Losing 2,400 Jobs–Including Most of Its Trail Workers
The U.S. Forest Service plans to cut 2,400 jobs, mainly seasonal workers, due to a budget shortfall, suspending 2025 hiring and worsening maintenance backlogs, causing employee frustration and uncertainty.
USFS Decision to Halt Prescribed Burns in California is History Repeating
The US Forest Service has paused prescribed burns in California to prioritize resources for potential wildfires, highlighting issues of inadequate funding, political instability, and the need for bipartisan support in forest management.
10 comments"The BTNF essentially hired Kosiba’s group, which could then contract out with other private companies. They agreed to do the job at about a third of that $120,000."
That's really not normal. What's going on in government spending?
The current fee for grazing, for example, is $1.35 monthly per head, up from $1.23... in 1966. Time for these rural users to start paying their fair share!
/s
I'm mostly kidding, but articles like this pretending that the major costs of running the USFS and other public lands are on rec. users instead of commercial drive me nuts. These public lands are used for commercial extractive purposes at a loss all. the. time. Why is federal spending on public lands so far down, while more americans than ever (proportional and absolute) are using these resources for recreation?
Related
US Forest Service proposes protections for old-growth trees, without logging ban
The US Forest Service proposes protecting old-growth trees in national forests, allowing public input but not enforcing a logging ban. Concerns arise over loopholes and lack of specific guidelines. President Biden's order aims to restrict logging, with ongoing updates planned.
'Primed to Burn:' Former Parks Canada Scientist Fears for Banff
Banff, Alberta, faces an escalating wildfire threat due to inadequate forest management and climate change. Experts urge immediate action for better mitigation strategies to protect residents and visitors.
U.S. national park system gets a $100M grant, the largest in its history
The National Park Foundation received a historic $100 million grant from Lilly Endowment Inc. to enhance national parks, focusing on youth access, ecosystem conservation, and inclusive narratives for visitors.
The Forest Service Is Losing 2,400 Jobs–Including Most of Its Trail Workers
The U.S. Forest Service plans to cut 2,400 jobs, mainly seasonal workers, due to a budget shortfall, suspending 2025 hiring and worsening maintenance backlogs, causing employee frustration and uncertainty.
USFS Decision to Halt Prescribed Burns in California is History Repeating
The US Forest Service has paused prescribed burns in California to prioritize resources for potential wildfires, highlighting issues of inadequate funding, political instability, and the need for bipartisan support in forest management.