Let's not Encrypt

The article critiques Let's Encrypt, an organization that provides free SSL certificates, arguing that it creates a false sense of security for website owners. The author highlights several issues, including the ease of certificate verification, which can be exploited by attackers, and the automatic renewal process that poses security risks. The author also points out that Let's Encrypt certificates are only valid for three months, leading to a burdensome renewal process that can disrupt website operations. Furthermore, the article suggests that the reliance on Let's Encrypt undermines the development of more robust security solutions and that the organization is funded by competitors, raising concerns about its long-term viability. The author concludes that the current system is flawed and that users are better off seeking alternative methods for securing their websites, as the existing model is unsustainable and potentially harmful.

- Let's Encrypt certificates may not provide the intended security against man-in-the-middle attacks.

- The automatic renewal process for Let's Encrypt certificates poses significant security risks.

- The short validity period of certificates leads to a cumbersome renewal process for website owners.

- The reliance on Let's Encrypt may hinder the development of better security solutions in the industry.

- The funding model of Let's Encrypt raises concerns about its independence and long-term sustainability.