Concerns About White House/Tech Collusion Have Disappeared with Elon's Ascension

The article discusses the apparent hypocrisy of certain commentators who previously expressed grave concerns about collusion between the White House and social media companies, particularly regarding censorship. These concerns were voiced during the Trump administration but have seemingly dissipated with Elon Musk's ownership of Twitter (now X) and Trump's return to the White House. The author highlights that while these commentators warned of a "censorship industrial complex," they now celebrate the alliance between Musk and Trump, indicating that their concerns were more about political alignment than principle. The piece critiques figures like Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger, who once labeled government connections to social media as a threat to democracy but have shifted their narratives to support the current administration. The author argues that this shift reveals a double standard, where the same individuals who condemned perceived government overreach are now silent or supportive when their political allies are involved. The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing this hypocrisy to inform the public about the inconsistencies in the narratives pushed by these commentators.

- Concerns about government and Big Tech collusion have diminished with Musk's ownership of X and Trump's return.

- Critics who once warned of censorship are now supportive of the Musk-Trump alliance.

- The article highlights a double standard in the narratives of certain commentators.

- The shift in rhetoric suggests that political alignment, rather than principle, drives these commentators' positions.

- Recognizing this hypocrisy is crucial for public awareness of media narratives.