November 27th, 2024

The medical contrarians picked to lead health agencies

President-elect Donald Trump has appointed controversial figures to lead health agencies, including Dr. Jay Bhattacharya for NIH, signaling a shift in health policy priorities and raising public health concerns.

Read original articleLink Icon
The medical contrarians picked to lead health agencies

President-elect Donald Trump has appointed a team of medical contrarians to lead key health agencies, reflecting a shift in health policy priorities. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a critic of pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates, has been nominated to head the National Institutes of Health (NIH). His appointment aligns with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s "Make America Healthy Again" agenda, which aims to reform food safety and health programs. Other nominees include Dr. Mehmet Oz for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Dr. Marty Makary for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These individuals, while lacking extensive bureaucratic experience, are known for their media presence and controversial views on health issues. Kennedy's agenda includes pausing NIH drug development and shifting focus to chronic diseases, while also targeting the CDC and FDA for perceived corruption and inefficiency. The new administration's approach contrasts sharply with Trump's previous term, which prioritized deregulation for the food and drug industries. Critics express concern over the potential public health implications of these appointments, particularly regarding vaccine safety and the management of health crises. The nominees' backgrounds suggest a significant departure from established public health practices, raising questions about the future direction of U.S. health policy.

- Trump has appointed a team of medical contrarians to lead health agencies.

- Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a critic of lockdowns, is nominated to head the NIH.

- The new health agenda focuses on reforming food safety and health programs.

- Critics warn of potential public health risks from the new appointees' controversial views.

- The administration's approach marks a significant shift from Trump's previous health policies.

Link Icon 2 comments
By @metalman - 5 months
The basic idea of having government regulators, antagonistic, to the profit driven sector they are trying to control is a good one. Going the next step and insisting that all deliberations are a matter of public record is also good. Also making sure that there are catestrophic consequences for companys and individuals who are proven to cause harm to large numbers of CITIZENS,would go a long long long, way towards restoring the confidence of a badly used population. get it?
By @snakeyjake - 5 months
I am ok.

I am healthy.

I make a shit ton of money.

I have a highly-skilled primary care doctor I've been seeing for two decades.

I am a domain expert who knows what it looks like when non-domain experts THINK they are experts in a domain they have no expertise in.

I know that I have no expertise in the health domain so I follow the directions of my physician (a highly-skilled domain expert) to the letter.

I know what "evidence based" means.

I know what a "p-value" is.

I know what "double blind" means.

I know what various cognitive biases are and even if I still fall prey to them on occasion I can recognize them.

I know Dr Oz and RFK Jr are full of shit so when they tell me to inject bleach and vitamins and stem cells into my penis to treat bird flu I know they are wrong.

I worry about everyone not as fortunate as I.